hozt
Products Services Reviews
Contact Us Email
top_blue_orange

Kodak DC4800 3.1MP Digital Camera w/ 3x Optical Zoom
By: Kodak       Average Rating: 4.0     Total Reviews: 99
More Information

Good though outdated camera     On: 2005-09-12

I was using this camera as recently as 6 months ago, though it stopped working when it had the unfortunate luck of shifting in the backseat of my car when traveling, and falling on to the concrete when I opened the door (Ive got a new Olympus C5500 now). Anyway, before that, I had the camera for about a year (I got it from a friend who had just bought a really great camera). While this camera is no match for my new Olympus, it was quite a good camera and a good introduction for me into semi-serious digital photography. I had a digital camera called a "JamCam" before this one, but it had few options and rather low picture quality (though for the price and the time when I got it, it was actually decent).

The Kodak DC4800 is excellent under good lighting conditions, getting photo quality prints with a good printer. I actually got some great indoor shots with the flash too, though you cant get to close (it will wash out the picture) or to far away (it will be to dark). The camera can be fully automatic or almost fully manual (there is no manual focus, and the automatic settings are able to make use of more F-stops then when in manual mode).

There are three focus modes: automatic (which usually works well except when dark, as there is no af assist lamp), Macro (for taking close-up shots as close as 10") and infinity (which allows you to lock the focus at infinity, which is good for distance shots).

The camera includes a 3x optical zoom which is nice. When fully zoomed out, this camera gives quite a wide field of view (the only thing on this camera which is actually better then my new camera).

Unless absolutely necessary, set the ISO setting to 100, as anything above that starts to get grainy. At 200 grain is noticeable but usually acceptable, and iso 400 is usually very grainy.

The camera also includes a nice neck strap, lens cap, tripod adapter, and a time delay feature to allow you to get into the picture. The LCD display on this camera is good except when you are in bright sunlight, and then it gets hard to see, so you might need to use the optical viewfinder in some conditions. The camera comes with a recharger. The batter life was just okay, but I got the camera and battery used, so a new battery probably would have been much better. The camera also has video out cables, but the friend I bought this camera from no longer had his, so I cant comment on them. Youll also probably want to get a larger compact flash card then the one that came with the camera.

Overall, this was a great camera in its day, and if you can find it used for a good price (be sure to compare prices as new cameras that beat this one are coming down in price all the time), it is a great starter camera which usually gets pretty good pictures (I won second place at the NJ State fair photo contest (amateur division) with a photo taken by this camera a year ago). The camera is also quite durable, as it took many moderate bumps before the final meeting between it and concrete which finally killed it.
great first gen 3MP camera, but it is old now...     On: 2004-09-02

Ive had this camera for about 3 years now.

Picture quality:
- takes great pictures outdoors, and indoor pictures with adequate lighting.
- flash is not adequate. pictures with flash are horrible. they come out all blurry - the shutter speed isnt fast enough/CCD not good enough (when using auto settings)

Use:
- I like having the ability to change the f-stop setting on the fly with the knob on top of the camera. Sure beats using the menus.
- The battery lasts a long time, but its always good to have a spare, especially if you use LCD alot.

Construction:
- Solid.
- Ive fallen on this thing while skiing (back of case is cracked) and took it with me when I accidentally fell into Lake Tahoe (camera was submerged), but amazingly it still works.

Summary:
Ive taken thousands of pictures with the camera. Certainly got good use out of it over the past 3 years.
However, newer cameras have better flash capability and record in video. My friends have the Canon SXXX series. They are 1/2 the size of the Kodak, and perform much better.

great first gen 3MP camera, but it is old now...     On: 2004-09-01

Ive had this camera for about 3 years now.

Picture quality:
- takes great pictures outdoors, and indoor pictures with adequate lighting.
- flash is not adequate. pictures with flash are horrible. they come out all blurry - the shutter speed isnt fast enough/CCD not good enough (when using auto settings)

Use:
- I like having the ability to change the f-stop setting on the fly with the knob on top of the camera. Sure beats using the menus.
- The battery lasts a long time, but its always good to have a spare, especially if you use LCD alot.

Construction:
- Solid.
- Ive fallen on this thing while skiing (back of case is cracked) and took it with me when I accidentally fell into Lake Tahoe (camera was submerged), but amazingly it still works.

Summary:
Ive taken thousands of pictures with the camera. Certainly got good use out of it over the past 3 years.
However, newer cameras have better flash capability and record in video. My friends have the Canon SXXX series. They are 1/2 the size of the Kodak, and perform much better.

A good 3.1 megapixel camera, but...
by: Anonymous    On: 2004-02-02

Ive had this camera about 18 months. The only thing that I find lacking in this camera is its ability to take indoor flash pictures. Even using the +/- exposure compensater the pics come out under exposed, especially if the subject is more than 5 feet from the lens. Other features work well. I decided to stop fooling with this camera and went for the Canon S50, wow what a difference. Goodbye Kodak, hello Canon.
Keeps breaking...and breaking...     On: 2004-01-26

First time it died was just within the one-year warranty, and it died again a year later. Im sending this $500.00 paperweight to Kodaks Vice President for Customer Relations with a nice note.
This one's a keeper!     On: 2003-12-20

Ive been using this camera for 2-1/2 years now. Even with all the market advancements, Im sticking with my trusty DC4800.

In 2001, going with 3.1 megapixels was a big splurge. Today its still a pretty high resolution, despite the 4 and 5 megapixel models now available. But I feel no need to upgrade. I honestly dont believe the average user needs to go higher than what the DC4800 offers. At this resolution, you can get good prints up to 8x10. Extra megapixels just mean more space wasted on your memory card.

The body is still sturdy, with a bit of damage from wear and tear. The worst is a hairline crack above the zoom dial. Additionally, the silver finish is wearing away at the corners. These signs of age are pretty minor considering the abuse Ive put this camera through. I dont even own a proper camera case - I just throw it in my bag and go!

The inside mechanisms continue to work perfectly. Ive taken over 9000 shots with this camera, so thats saying a lot! Even the battery charges fresh and new as the day I bought it.

If youre in the market for a used camera, I would definitely recommend the DC4800. Id advise buying this even over newer Kodak models, which Ive heard are not great. Kodak made a rare gem with the DC4800, and Im hanging onto mine!


Poor Quality and Post-Purchace Support     On: 2003-11-18

While the picture quality is quite good with this camera, the shutter delay is quite extreme. The low rating is more a factor of the quality of the camera and the post-purchase customer support. The camera completely stopped working just out of the one-year factory warranty. Kodak has a flat fee of $150 to repair. The camera stopped working once again after the third use, but since it was out of the 30-day repair warranty, Kodak would only offer another $150 repair or an upgrade to one of their other cameras with a trade in. The cost of the upgrade was more than the street price of the camera.
A wonderful digital camera
by: Anonymous    On: 2003-09-29

Ive owned this Kodak camera for almost two years and it is my first digital camera. It feels so comfortable in my hands from the first time I hold it. It takes great outdoor pictures and average indoor pictures with low light conditions. Most digital camera dont do well in low light situation. The best feature is the 28mm lens;hard to find in a point and shoot digital camera. I can cover more area with it.
perfect first digital camera     On: 2003-08-28

I have used this camera for about 2 years now. It was the perfect first digital camera for a budding photographer. I love the manual controls, especially slow shutter speeds.

The flash is terrible though, no good for low-light typical indoor/outdoor shots. Though I did use it quite a lot for concert photography - slow shutter speed (.7 secs) and also used the flash and the end result was quite pleasing.

Also, I have the wide-angle adaptor lens - forget using the flash with it! It casts a horrible shadow! No good!

3.1 megapixels suited me for a long time - although I didnt print a whole lot of the photos I took with this camera, the few I did print came out well at 8x10 and slightly larger.

I am now ready to move on - my next purchase is the 4 megapixel Canon G3! But I will keep my trusty Kodak, as it has served me well.


Excellent Value     On: 2003-08-04

We have used this camera for over 2 years running on a daily basis without a problem. The pictures are fantastics and work very well for our website needs. The flash is not that great and is not reliable for dark settings. Other than that the camera is very handy and advanced.

Based on my experience with this product, I would highly recommend a Kodak digital camera.

For the price and quality, it is a 4 stars no doubt. If the flash was better, it would have earned 5 stars.

Best regards
J @ Sadoun Satellite Sales


great camera - still comparable to todays model     On: 2003-07-04

Excellent photos. Simple and easy to use, yet still technically advanced and customizable for the hardcore group. Ability to change apeture, light intake , red eye reduction, b&w or sephia photos also.Can change an average Joe into a photography nut. The included rechargeable battery is great but I still wish you could use regular AA batteries in emergency situations.Auto focus is wonderful, manual settings need time to master. Sweet zoom lense. Good software. Able to upgrade the software AND the internal firmware via the kodak website. Included 16 MB compact flash will give you a max of 47 fair photos (sometimes more) adjustable to 32 great photos or 8 excellent photos.(the great photos are more than acceptable). Upgrade to the 128 MB compact card and the 290 great photos will have you smiling forever.
Great Camera     On: 2003-01-06

This Is A Really Good Camera, And Produces Great Pictures As Soon As You Get Used To All The Controlls. There Are A Lot Of Settings For Different Lighting Conditions, Lighting Temperiturs, Apeture, Shutterspeed, Colour Saturation, And More. As Soon As You Get Used To It All, You Can Take Some GREAT Pics. The Flash Is A Little Weak, But You Can Plug An External Flash Into It via. PC Cable, And Nighttime Pics Come Out Great. The Best Digital Camera Short Of A Digital SLR.
Dissapointed...     On: 2003-01-06

I started my foray into digital photography a few years ago with the Kodak DC120. It was a great little camera for taking candid and vacation photos that I could print at 3.5 x 5 or 4 x 6 on my Epson 740 printer with excellent results. Based on this experience, when I started shopping for a higher resolution camera, I gave Kodak serious consideration. The DC4800 was the latest in the Kodak line at the time. I ended up buying this camera due to my previous experience with Kodak and a trade-in offer for my old camera. I wish I had kept my old camera! This camera does take great photos -- if you only ever take photos in bright outdoor light!! The flash is TOTALLY inadequite for the camera, if I shoot 20 pics indoors, I am lucky if 2 come out usable...the others are too blurry. The bluriness is caused by either low light conditions, or the subject being closer than 3-4 feet from the camera. ... My suggestion? Do NOT buy this camera! I might consider one of the newer Kodak easyshare cameras, but I would read all the reviews carefully before considering another Kodak after this experience.
Poor in low light     On: 2002-12-19

I owned a DCS280 and was very satisfied. The DCS4800 has all the features I want and all the manual controls. However, the automatic low light pictures are very disappointing. We use the autofunction to grab spontanious pictuers of our son. Needless to say, most are blurry. In addition, the eyeglass focus adjust or has fallen out with the setting out of focus. The pop up flash does not lock the flash in place. Small cracks have developed on the front of the camera case.
excellent camera     On: 2002-10-29

very good camera. well, it is too sensitive to light. We could not get good indoor pictures.
A Fine Camera     On: 2002-09-17

This is my third Kodak digital camera and is my favorite to date. The reason I like Kodaks is I feel the menus are simple to use and the build quality / functions of the cameras are excellent.

You can use the 4800 in a number of modes, as a simple point and click mode, or for the more professional photographer you can get into aperture, light, exposure etc...

The resolution at 3.1 Mega Pixel is excellent and when pictures are printed out using services like ofoto or shutterfly the quality is exceptional. The camera has a 3x Optical zoom which is excellent, I choose not to rate digital zoom as attribute of a camera.

My only dislike with this camera is its size, there are a lot of smaller cameras out there, however I am not sure if there are many with the same kind of quality.


Great for outdoor pictures; try something else for low light
by: Anonymous    On: 2002-06-04

I owned a Kodak DC280 and loved it. Took great shots and the flash worked great. I gave it away and bought the DC 4800 expecting similar great photos. The ones with plenty of light are fine, nice and crisp and print nicely. The ones in low light just arent as good. I think the "auto" selects a shutter speed of 1/8/sec which is crazy and impossible to take a good photo without a tripod. The flash of course helps but you have to be within 8 - 10 feet. Bottom line. Its ok for the money, particularly if you buy one used (like I did) but if you want to print 8 x 10s you may want to keep looking.
Fantastic     On: 2002-06-03

This camera is amazing! It had everything we were looking for, 3.1 MP, 3x zoom, and rechargable batteries. Moreover, you can override the auto control and manually select the f-stop, ISO, shutter speed, color saturation, exposure, sharpness and exposure metering (center-weighted, etc...). It even allows for you to take black and whites (with 3 filter options, none, red or yellow) and sepia photos. It is certainly the most powerfull of the Kodak line, it is a shame they seem to be moving away from these features and going after the market share where people dont want all these options. That isnt to say that you cant just point and click... you can, it has auto-focus and auto exposure/speed controls... but I like the ability to override those, especially when I have backlighting or want to play with the focal depth. Oh, and another rare feature is that it has a video output jack that you can run to a TV to view your pictures on. This has come in handy when visiting friends or relatives and I wanted to show them pictures we had in our camera but didnt want to download them to a computer. The menu system is amoung the more intuitive that I have seen. All manual settings can be changed with just a couple button presses and I have yet to delete a picture by accident. Some options, like f-stop and exposure control can be controled from dials on the camera without even going into any menu. The battery is good, recently I took the camera out of town for a long weekend and forgot the battery charger. We took pictures at many events over a few days and just barely got by before the battery ran out. Of course, we have learned over time some tips on how to extend the battery life such as minimizing LCD viewing of pictures. The 3x optical zoom is nice but I would prefer a little more. I dont like the quality digital zoom provides, but fortunately there is a setup option to disable digital zoom so that you dont accidently use it.

As close to perfect as it is, there are some minor gripes. The manual exposure control dial seems a little flimsy like it might come off one day, fortunately it is rarely used. Second there is a little door that you open that covers the USB and battery ports that also seems a little flimbsy. Also, the button you use to turn on/off the camera is a bit too close to the shutter button. If someone else is taking our picture, they invariably press the wrong button unless we make it clear which button to press. The flash is somewhat weak (although comparible to small film cameras). Another gotcha is that you have to press the shutter button half way down to lock in the auto focus, speed and f-stop settings before pressing the button the rest of the way down to take the picture. Although this is standard with nearly all but the most inexpensive cameras, it is something that you have to carefully explain to anyone else who you want to take a picture or the picture will likely be out of focus. But then again, it is digital so you can look at the picture right away and determine if it needs to be re-shot. Finally, I think that the 16 meg card is much too small for any type of vacation use. At the highest resolution but least compressed JPG, each photo is about 700-900 kb. We purchased an additional 64Mb card which are quite cheap now and have yet to run out of memory (and if we did we could go out and buy another from any electronics store).

All in all, a great camera!!


great camera with some nice features u can't find on others     On: 2002-04-07

I think one nice feature about this camera is its compatibility with an external flash. For many 35mm enthusiast, an external flash is a must-have to provide sufficient lighting from different angles. I bought a Vivitar 2000 external flash and used its PC sync cord to plug into the DC4800 terminal, it worked out nicely. Now you dont have to settle for front lighting all the time from the built-in flash, instead, you can have bounce lighting, left and right lighting, etc. Try it and you will love the result.
Seemed good at first, then the DC4800 went DOWN HILL!!     On: 2002-02-23

Before this camera I owned a Canon S10 (GREAT CAMERA). This time I went looking for a 3.1 Meg Pixel camera. This Kodak seemed good at first, but below 3.1 all the picture quality seemed fuzzy (not clear at all like the Canon. Then after 3 wks of use the on/off switch went (perhaps after 300 pictures).

Bottom line I am not happy with the camera at all and would recommend NOT buying one.


Kodak & Cameras...     On: 2002-02-15

...I have found the specifications for this camera to be false (as a result of exhaustive testing). Most high and low numbers (f/stops and lens sizes in mm) are exaggerated. The only thing it does well is take pictures of fruit bowls and [use] up electricity. It has no freeze frame due to excessive high available light required by the CCD. Blurred shots at the picture element level are the norm, sharpness and pixelation are rarely seen do to the low resolution and magnification of the CCD,
which likes to run hot. The camera only takes one jpeg mega byte in ideal light. It will produce a tiff nine mega byte that is of lesser quality (saturation artifacts). Using this logic
a million dollars is actually nine million, right ?
Without f/1.8 your better off with one of their disposables. The Auto Focus firmware reduces all shutter speeds to still life in low light or anything less than bright daylight. Running three strobes on a tripod and dragging a 12Volt battery with inverter to provide power seems a little excessive.
Wow!!     On: 2002-01-03

Purchased this camera as a gift for Christmas and its wonderful! It produces quality professional photos without much skill needed. The various color and black & white modes are great for everyday use. Has a huge array of shutter speeds to capture some great night shots. Great camera for anyone from professional to novice!
Get it!     On: 2002-01-03

Very fine camera for the newbie. With the SINGLE exception of low-light photography, this camera excels in all areas. Of note, this camera is rugged. Ive had it for 6 months and dropped it from waist height on asphalt (it also skidded across 3 lanes of traffic on its bottom), linoleoum and an oak hardwood floor and it did not so much as discharge the battery.
Incredible. Most pixel bang for the buck and the outdoor/natural light shots are breathtaking. The camera also has a multitude of professional 35mm SLR type functions for those that know what the heck they are for.
easy to use     On: 2001-12-28

One of the problems with cameras and electronics in general is the lack of simplicity. So home runs in the electronics business (like the Imac and the Palm Pilot) try to keep it simple through thoough design and knowing what comsumers want.
Kodak makes this not only easy to use, but fun. Most people who buy a camera end up with features they never use and dont bother to learn. Kodak gives you the features you want, and makes software to make things accessible to the average camera user who wants wonderful pictures right away and the ability to spread them around.
This camera is what 90% of camera buyers are really looking for - but they end up with something else too often
Great Camera -- Not Why No Buzz
by: Anonymous    On: 2001-12-18

Ive had mine for about 7 months now and really like it. I cant add much to the other reviews here, other than a question: why is there so little coverage of this camera around? It really seems to be the forgotten stepchild. of
A great digital camera     On: 2001-12-11

I bought one in March and liked it ever since. Its small, light and easy to use. It gives you many controls over the settings. Im no photography expert at all, so I never used those fully manual settings. But its comforting to know that theyre there. You have more options to save pictures, from uncompressed TIFF to 0.8MP, 2.1MP and 3.1MP JPG(high compression, medium compression and etc). This makes me feel better than those ambiguous "good, fine, best" grades used in other digital cameras. I did have some grainy pictures but after I set white balance to auto, everything is fine. I used it on a 10 day trip along with two 128M CF cards and a quick charger. It worked perfectly well. Well, I wish I could have more CF cards. Fortunately my friends brought a laptop with him. The pictures were sharper and clearer than those taken by a Fuji 6800. This camera works especially well outdoor under strong light. The battery life is good too. It can handle about 100 pictures with flash on.
Herere my recommendations:
1. buy a lens cap cord
2. buy a quick charger set which also includes a battery. The quick charger is very convenient and it takes less than an hour to fully charge a drained battery.
3. buy at least 256 MB CF cards if youre out for a trip. It will allow you to take about 260 pictures (equivalent to 10 rolls of film) using 3.1MP low compression mode.
Very versatile and user friendly.     On: 2001-12-08

I bought this camera in March prior to a trip to Germany. I didnt get a chance to use it too much prior to the trip so I took most of my pictures with my film camera. I used the camera a lot during the summer and got very comfortable with it. When I went to Rome last month I used the Kodak for most of my pictures. I was very impressed with the quality of the pictures, the number of hight quality pictures I could get on a smart card in the compressed mode and most of all its versatility, especially taking indoor pictures inside the large churches. A flash would be useless in those circumstances. I got really nice pictures using just the available light. Even got interior pictures of the Sistine Chapel without flash before the guard stopped me.
I am very pleased with the camera and recommend it to anyone who is looking for more than a point and shoot camera.
excellent picture quality     On: 2001-12-08

Super nice product! Though 3.1 MP seems too much for viewing picture on monitor, its performance is absolutely among the best. I like its long time exposure functionality to take natural picture in dark surroundings.
This is all what you need for a nice digital camera.
weekness: flash is not powerful and batteries dont last long enough when LCD is on.
Really Great... minor glitches     On: 2001-12-07

I received my Kodak DC 4800 and immediately found out that it was a discontinued product, which disconcerted me. However, I was pleasantly surprised by the camera. It has a picture clarity of cameras of higher price tags. It takes crisp pictures inside and outside as well. The detail is explosive. I like to "tinker" and I dont want my camera to tell me what to do (at times). This camera is fully adjustable (as were cameras in the past). The new line of Kodak is fully automatic -- in other words, you loose control over picture taking. I think it gives me better pictures than a conventional camera -- with instant access to my picture work which is the joy of the digital age.
I initially received a defective camera. Kodak attempted to fix it once. I sent the camera in via insured mail and the camera was promptly returned with a note saying all was A OKAY. But it wasnt. The camera wouldnt turn on. The screen would not show an image (etc). I called Kodak and the sent me out another jewel. I have no problems with either camera nor Kodak. They were responsive and responsible.
I highly recomend this camera even in its used form. It may very well be the last of its kind: a fully adjustable high resolution digital camera.
Simply Fantastic!!!     On: 2001-11-29

I love to take photos and had put off buying a digital camera because most of the images I had seen were less than desirable. I refused to buy a digital camera that did not take pictures as well as my traditional camera. This camera by Kodak was the one for me! Not only is it easy to use, but it also has many features that you wont find on other cameras. It has several color and flash modes to allow you to be a photography wiz. The images are crisp and perfect; no color differentiations whatsoever. This is simply the best digital camera I have seen.
Love this camera for a lot of things, but not all
by: Anonymous    On: 2001-11-22

Ive been using digital cameras for more than 5 years now, since 640 x 480 was state of the art. This is my third, and I really love it when it performs well. Picture quality is absolutely outstanding. I would trade the great images for the lack of recording sound or video any day.

Its great for outdoor shots of both landscapes and people. Indoors is more problematic. In low light conditions, especially with a nearby artificial light source, pictures are hit or miss. Some come out OK; others are blurry. And unfortunately, they look fine on the little LCD so I think the photos are OK; its only when I see them on screen that I discover theyre out of focus. Ive tried fiddling with the manual settings for this with little success.

For a travel/vacation camera, its superb. If all youre doing is taking quick indoor shots of family and friends, you might want to think about another camera.


Not the quality I had hoped for...     On: 2001-10-25

I purchased an Olympus camera for my parents that was only a 2.4 mgpix and then did some research and thought that the DC4800 would be better. I have used both and the Olympus by far has taken better pictures for half the price and almost have the pixels. My DC4800 takes better indoor pictures without the flash even though the camera tells me to use flash. Indoor quality is lacking compared to outdoor. The Olympus also captures action shots better than the DC4800 as well. Everyone has rated this camera well. Maybe there is something wrong with mine?
super camera     On: 2001-09-28

I previously owned a Kodak 215 and 290, and really liked both
of them, but the 4800 is fantastic. Kodak, when will you be
ready with a 4 megapixel / 10 power optical zoom? Ill
probably buy it. Keep up the outstanding quality.
Great camera, great buy     On: 2001-09-27

For the general digital camera user, the Kodak DC4800 camera is one of the best buys around. Its one of the cheapest 3+ megapixel cameras you will find, yet its loaded with features and its incredibly easy to use.

Also, unlike many other cameras which make you buy several key components separately, the DC4800 comes complete with everything you need to take great pictures right out of the box, including Lithium rechargable battery, AC adapter, 16MB memory card, and all cables. The only things you may need to buy later are a carrying case and possibly more memory for longer outings. The Lithium battery is key - Ive been thouroughly frustrated with other digital cameras that use AA batteries which they use up after 5 or 6 pictures.

Ive also found the instruction manual to be extremely well written and indexed - the best instructions out of four digital cameras Ive used - and the camera itself has proven very durable - I must admit Ive dropped it several times, but it still works as good as new.

The best thing of all about the DC4800 though, is the outstanding picture quality. Compared to pictures I took at the same resolution with other cameras, the DC4800 pictures are always a little sharper and a little more vivid. The colors this camera produces are really outstanding. Even the lowest resolution is pretty darn good.

I would take this camera over several cameras that are almost twice the cost - I am thoroughly satisfied with this camera.


Great camera at a great price     On: 2001-09-07

I purchased this camera in July and it has been a wonderful "out-of-the-box" experience. The menus are easy to understand and within a short period of time I was up and running. I have only used the camera in high definition mode and the results are incredible. Made a 12"x18" print, without any digital enhancements, that rivals the quality of a conventional enlargement from 35mm color film. There are several other features that ranked high on my list. The selection of apertures is important for selective focus and this camera gives me that control. The external flash connector works well with my portable (and more powerful)flash units. In short, a well-built camera at an affordable price.
My 3rd digital camera in 7 years     On: 2001-09-03

After a year long review of the various digital cameras (under $600/) I finally purchased a DC-4800 camera and boy what a pleasent surprise. This camera is great with sharp, clear 8 X 11 photographs and beautiful resolution. My previous digital cameras Epson 500 and then a 600 were nice, but this Kodak is loaded with the latest technoligy and very easy to use. I especially like the zoom and color saturation (bright) or natural color capability. I highly recommend this camera for ease of use and the beautiful pictures. The camera comes complete with all the goodies needed, however I did purchase a [price] ScanDisk reader for easier and quicker downloads.
LOVE IT!!
by: Anonymous    On: 2001-08-30

I just love this camera. It is my first digital camera so I cant compare it to others but it sure meets my needs. I would give it 5 stars except it came with a picture card with only 16MB. I could have gone on for some time with 16MB but I did actually purchase another picture disk for more memory. I did not need the expensive Kodak disk. The cheaper brand works fine. It works easily on my computer and the pictures are good quality. Id buy it again if I had the chance.
Excellent buy     On: 2001-08-18

For the price and features of this camera, it is an excellent buy and hard to beat. I have been a 35mm SLR user for over 40 years and I find the quality coming from this camera to be excellent. I can manipulate the lens or go automatic. I have been using it for about 6 months and I am amazed at the quality especially in low light areas. I still need to get the attachment lens and try those out but this is adequate for 90% of my work. The only complaint I have is the delay from snapping the shot to the recording of the shot where a young child (and adults too)can quickly turn their head.
a few glitches, but happy overall     On: 2001-08-09

P>I didnt find the camera very intuitive to use, which problem was worsened by the fact that I dont use a camera very often, so I tend to forget the solutions that worked last time. (Why should a camera be so complex that you need to reconstruct its systems after a lapse of a few weeks?) In particular, I found myself too often taking medium-distance shots with the close-up setting, and getting washed-out images in bright sunlight. Yet I once made my living as a photographer! I couldnt recommend this to the soccer mom or dad who only wants an occasional snapshot.

That said, Im glad I own it. Ive gone almost entirely digital in my life, and if it werent for the digital camera I probably wouldnt take pictures at all. The picture quality is good, and you have some (not a huge amount) of selectivity in how your photo will be framed and exposed. (You can select the lens opening, for example.)

I recently changed computers, and I had no problem installing the software on a Windows Me box without a patch from Kodak.


Further to my review...     On: 2001-07-28

Further to my review dated July 5, Kodak has confirmed to me that as originally shipped, the DC4800 camera was not fully compatible with Windows Me. An upgraded software download is available on the the Kodak Website. It is about 7 MB and so takes a while to download. You need to delete any preexisting DC4800 software on your computer and then install the download. I did, and the camera now runs fine on my PIII/800 Windows Me puter. No more distorted thumbnails. It runs so-so on my other PIII/450 Windows 98 machine. Thumbnails load slowly.

I earlier installed the firmware upgrade and have had no problems with low-light focusing or exposure. The camera does well in remarkably little light.

The zoom control has not worked on three or four occasions. One moves the switch and nothing happens. I am not sure yet whether its a camera defect or I whether I may have had something set wrong. I hope the latter.

Generally speaking, the camera is a nice handling, nice feeling little piece of machinery. I just wish Kodak had taken a little more care with the software rather than leaving it to customers to put Humpty Dumpty together post-purchase. Oh well, at least Kodak was responsive -- after I told them that if I hadnt heard back by a certain date, I would publicize their non-response here.


Like Camera, Hate rebate     On: 2001-07-23

I have had the camera for about 6 weeks now. It arrived very timely. Light weight, easy to use. Perfect for a novice.

However, Kodaks rebate system is very, very poor. I received almost immediate acknowledgement from thier rebate center that they had all the necessary documents. Now after 6 weeks and a phone call to the rebate center, Im told it will be ANOTHER 30 days before I get my $... rebate.

DONt do as I did and put too much emphasis on the rebate when making your buying decision.


Excellent digital camera!
by: Anonymous    On: 2001-07-23

After much research, I bought this camera to replace a more limited HP digital camera. It has proven to be an outstanding camera with excellent resolution and ease of use. From the gripes Ive read, I dont think people read the manual nor understand the basics of SLR photography. The flexibility and override features of this camera provide excellent results. I bought a 128 mb compactflash disk for $70; Also, recommend getting an additional battery and wall-charger; I also bought a rechargeable external battery pack that lasts FOREVER! For those experienced with manually adjusting an SLR camera, this is the best camera for digital!
Kodak DC4800     On: 2001-07-20

Wow, my first dive into digital photograhpy has been a success. At the 3 megapixal setting w/ jpeg compression, youre able to get 64 pictures on a 64MB compact flash, and the resolution and color are 35mm processing quality. 4x6 up to 8x10 print on my HP Deskjet 950c at photo processing quality. The camera is easy to use for the point and shoot type (like me), but has lots of manual capability for the more expert photographer.

The Kodak software provided is also excellent - easy way to save, print, and view photos.

A great package for the price. The best value for a 3 megapixel camera I could find at [price]after rebate.


Out of Focus
by: Anonymous    On: 2001-07-13

I recently bought a DC4800. I took several pictures inside and out. All of the indoor pictures were way out of focus. I thought that maybe I just got a "lemon". After checking around, I found out this is a comon complaint with the camera.
Kodak DC4800 = Cheap
by: Anonymous    On: 2001-07-05

I cannot understand why this camera is so highly rated. As an experienced photographer, I find the quality of components rather cheap, like for instance the plastic lens holder. I was also irritated that after spending over ... on the camera and all accessories, Kodak would not honor the ... rebate because of an adminstrative error.
Excellent, but...     On: 2001-07-05

Largely prompted by the positive reviews here I just acquired the DC4800, my first digital cam. I second the positive comments and wont be repetitive. But there are some minor negatives.

1) No lens cap cord so the cap wont get lost. That is a chintzy omission by Kodak. The cap is small and would soon be gone. I jury-rigged a rubber band as a temporary attachment until I can devise something prettier.

2) I purchased the DC4800EZ kit which includes an extra battery and a 64MB card. But its still incomplete. The kit should also include the outboard battery charger, and a camera case. Shortsighted marketing by Kodak.

3) The camera literature speaks of Windows 98 and 2000 but not Windows Me. I have Windows Me. There may be a minor software conflict. When opening .JPG files from Windows Explorer, with the DC4800 camera software installed the thumbnails that come up are badly distorted. You can open the photos themselves and work on them full-size OK, attach them to emails OK, etc., but the thumbnails are unviewable. I uninstalled and reinstalled the DC4800 software several times. With the DC4800 software absent the thumbnails are fine. With it present they are unusable. It appears there is some glitch between the DC4800 software and Windows Me. I have emailed Kodak to that effect and am awaiting a response.


Easy for Beginners
by: Anonymous    On: 2001-07-05

Im no rocket scientist so I was looking for an easy to use digital camera that produced good results. Many sources I read pointed to this camera. It also has all the accessories necessary to make it work; things like the USB connection, a power charger, battery included, and a media card. I read a few reviews at Amazon where the customer had trouble setting up so I was prepared for possible problems. So I get the camera, charge it up, install the PC software, and the thing works like a champ. No problems. The book is easy to read, the camera is easy to use, and I found the software simple and intuitive. I am very pleased with my purchase. My challenge now is to find a great photo printer. I have also kept the camera at the default settings and bought a bigger media card - the 64mb media card gives me about 64 3.1mb photos. Whats the point of getting a 3x mb camera if you are going to dumb it down? I am very pleased so far.
My first Digital camera     On: 2001-07-04

I would like to start out by saying this is my first experience with digital photography. For the last 30 years, I have used a 35MM Nikon F with the FTN meter. After doing research to determine which camera I thought would fit my needs, I purchased the Kodak DC4800. Before going on my vacation, I also purchased a 128 MB flash card and the extra battery and charger. While on vacation I took 101 pictures with about a third to one half with using the flash. I then came home and downloaded the pictures into my PC 3 or four times before saving them to my hard drive. During this time, I never changed or recharged the battery and had no problems at all. As of yet I have not tried the external flash. I strictly wanted to find out what the camera by itself would do. At this point, I am very impressed with the ease of how the camera works and the ability to control all of the many settings and not have to be a programming wizard to do it. With just a little effort and playing with the buttons, you can just about figure everything out without even using the manual. This camera is very user friendly. I would also like to mention even with being very light it seems to be well constructed. This camera is easy to hold and the buttons for the different controls all seem to be just where you would want them. I did have a little problem with the focusing, but after realizing the camera needed to be set on the distance setting for almost all shots and downloading the new software off the Kodak web site this problem has been taken care of. Letting the camera program everything gives me very good results and takes all the work out of picture taking. This leaves me with just the fun aspects, frame point and shoot... It is nice that if I get into special situations though I can still take control of all the settings if I think it becomes necessary. Bottom line is it easy to use, gets great pictures, and I would highly recommend this camera to anyone.

I would like to add this information that might help in purchasing this camera. At the default setting of 3.1 MP the resolution is 2160 X 1440. This is an approx. file size of 960 KB. That means you are going to get just a little over one picture per MB. So a 65MB card = 65 pictures or 128MB card = 128 pictures. I recieved a 16MB card with my camera and sixteen pictures just doesn`t get the job done. I purchased a 128MB and think this was a wise investment for me. When ordering a camera just figure about how many pictures you want to be able to take without changing cards or downloading and that will tell you what size card you need to purchase to accommodate your needs.

One more thing I would like to add is that when you take a picture it is not like useing a regular camera. You push the button to take the picture half way down to set the focus and exsposure, the press it all the way down to take a picture. If you press the shutter all the way down in one complete movment your pictures will be out of focus and the exsposure will also be wrong. This is one of the few things I had to read the manual on to find out how to do correctly. Somehow I think that a lot of the problems people have (if not all) could be eliminated by spending some time learning how to use the camera correctly. It is different from a 35MM or a plain point and shoot camera. Like I mentioned in the title , this is my first digital camera after using a 35MM for 30 years and I think it works great.... YES I DID TAKE TIME TO EXSPERIMENT WITH IT before comming to my conclusion. If I had made a quick judgement before learning how the camera works I would not have rated very high.

Again I would like to say that I am very pleased with this camera. GO BUY ONE!!!!


Check your camera for cracks!!!!!!
by: Anonymous    On: 2001-07-02

I have owned this camera for 4 months.

First off let me start by saying there is definitely a manufacturing glitch somewhere, as there have been numerous accounts of the cases of this camera developing cracks. I for one have one with cracks. It typically appears around the LCD, and zoom lever. Kodak is repairing this under warranty, but who needs a new camera that develops cracks?? If you are interested in reading more about this, please see this forum: http://www.dpreview.com/forums/forum.asp?forum=1011 specifically this thread: http://www.dpreview.com/forums/read.asp?forum=1011&page=1&message=1107683 I just think potential buyers should be aware of this problem.

Now on to the picture taking ability. I had a DC290 before, and this one comes no where near the quality of the Kodak DC290. I did the firmware upgrade, it DID NOT help my indoor shots, which usually turn out terrible. In low light, this camera doesnt do its job effectively. I can tell you that outdoors the picture quality is great, but who uses a camera outdoors 100% of the time? I know I dont. But for the price, it was an okay deal for me. With the rebate I ended up paying 375.00, which is pretty good.


Gorgeous, smart, fun camera!     On: 2001-06-24

I received this camera complete with all accessories as a high school graduation present. I had already owned another digital camera for about two years and had outgrown it, as my photography skills improved by about ten-fold. This is definately a great camera for me and for anyone who is ready to take a more professional step with their pictures, and who wants to get a great, high resolution result.

Ive been reading some of the negative reviews and I have to say that the gripes that people have can be solved through a bit of personal involvement, or cannot be solved, because almost every other camera out there is the same!

Im glad Kodak uses lithium batteries, because my other camera drained four (name brand) alkaline batteries in 10 minutes. Its no different with any other camera. My dad works with lots of video equipment, and he said that there are no digital cameras out there that wont significantly drain batteries within a few short moments.

As to software flaws Ive read about, being unable to delete photos and send email are hardly huge issues that deserve giving this camera 1 or 2 stars. AOL, Outlook, or any email program gives simple instructions on how to attach photos to your emails in mere seconds, and deleting files is something easily learned and done through the use of a basic Windows or Macintosh file manager. These are basic computer user skills; if you cant do this, then should you be using a digital camera?

My only disappointment with this camera regards a personal issue. Im scared to take this camera outside my home, for fear of getting mugged for it. :) Its beautifully constructed, easy to use, not that heavy for a digital camera, and quietly functions. I am shocked how well my pictures come out in natural light without using the flash.

This camera was one of the best presents Ive ever received, and I think everyone who wants a high - end digital camera should purchase this one :)


Exceptional Camera--Got To Have it!!     On: 2001-06-22

As a first time owner and user of any digital camera, I chose this camera because of the many features, as well as the price w/ rebate. I have to say, this camera is EXTREMELY easy to use and operate. I have never touched a digital camera before, & I found this one to be very simplistic in operation. It takes great pics, and although the memory card included is a bit small, this is a fantastic deal! I also like the looks (more like an SLR), as well as it is lightweight. No problems what so ever. Other than upgrading the memory card, you may want to purchase an additional battery for backup. Otherwise, you CANT go wrong w/ this camera!! The software included is very easy to use and understand. I found no problem figuring out how to modify / enhance digitally stored pictures. (I started out w/ no clue)--I fiddled w/ it a bit, and next thing you know, I had it all figured out! Dont hesitate to purchase this camera. For the price, the 3.1 mega pixels, and the numerous features, you are definitely getting a bang for your buck!!
Versatile camera
by: Anonymous    On: 2001-06-19

Has many features that you can manually adjust or go completely automatic. You can burst shoot, shoot in two modes of color, b&w or sepia tones. Nice 3x optical zoom lense as well as less desirable 2x digital zoom. It is light weight, easy to handle and even has a closeup feature in the LCD of the picture you just took. It even has six choices of quality (compression settings).All in all I highly recommend this camera to all.
Great in any situation     On: 2001-06-12

Im a small-time enthusiast, and this camera has a great many things going for people in my category (people who arent pros or experts, but care enough about photography to grimace at the quality of most point-and-shoot cameras; people who want a camera that can take a carefully designed photograph, as well as an on-the-fly fun shot).

I wont get into all the details-- theres a great write-up of this camera at

http://www.imaging-resource.com/PRODS/DC4800/D48A.HTM ,

but basically, the gist is that there are more options than you could shake a big stick at (perfect when you want to setup a nice photograph), which are all very easy to access (so you wont spend an hour doing it), that also works very well in automatic mode (when you want to take that on-the-fly shot), but also lets you combine any degree of automatic and manual functionality.

Two great things I want to specifically mention about the camera, though, are its terrific options for color adjustment, as well as the ability to combine and adjust the automatic functionality.

The options for adjusting color are amazing-- again, I wont go into all the different options (Id be writing for about an hour if I did-- the article above describes the options very well), but the options are numerous, and are genuinely useful (i.e. produces real differences in the final shot-- theyre not gimmicks). For instance, saturated color does amazing things to green-- great for outdoors shots!

But the really great thing about the camera is the ability to combine automatic and manual functionality. Instead of forcing you to choose between fully automatic and fully manual mode, instead you can choose any number of settings manually, and let the camera do the rest. Often times I will set the f-stop, or the color scheme, or the film speed, or the sharpness, or the white balance, or any combination of those, and let the camera do the rest. This is absolutely WONDERFUL for people (like me) who often wish to add some specific element to a photo without having to take full control of all settings. The only exception to this is shutter speed selection-- if you choose a shutter speed, you must also choose the f-stop. Nonetheless, Kodaks implementation of automatic and manual functionality is really slick.

You wont find this many options on any other 3.1MP camera that prices for <= $600.

Warning to potential buyers: buy a case, it doesnt come with one.


Nice - but don't rely on the flash     On: 2001-06-07

I like everything about this camera but the flash. It has a very short range (10 ft max) and even within that range produces inconsistent exposures. Some are OK and some extremely dark. It is as if the circuitry that times the flash is not working properly. I returned the camera for repair or replacement and Kodak responded that operation was "within design limits". I guess its a poor design. For the price, I expected better performance.
Great Digital Camera - Beginners and Experts!
by: Anonymous    On: 2001-05-30

I just upgraded to the DC4800 from the Kodak DC280 2.1 MP camera, which is a great camera itself. Here are some quick reasons why this camera fulfills every digital camera need of mine:

1. Rechargeable Li-On battery. No more messing with batteries. I simply plug the camera in and I have a freshly charged battery. It lasts a LONG time. If you need more battery time, you can get an extra battery to plug in.

2. 3.1 Megapixel pictures rival film. Great, clear, pictures.

3. Easy to use, yet very powerful. This camera can point and shoot, or you can control every settting via a menu, dial, or switch. It couldnt be easier to use, but its nice to know that you can tweak settings such as ISO, F stop, etc.

4. 3X optical zoom. Most cameras are 2X. I dont use digital zoom, but its here too.

5. Uses inexpensive and reliable compactflash media

I could go on and on. This is a great camera.

Buy it! You wont be sorry.


Not the camera I expected
by: Anonymous    On: 2001-05-25

I purchased a 4800 after owning a Kodak 260. The transition was not easy and the new camera just isnt what I expected. The software doesnt give me the flexiblity that the old one did and the camera buttons themselves are not placed well in design. I seem to keep turning the camera off - instead of taking pictures. Perhaps I just expected Kodak to make an improved version of what I considered to be a great camera - but to me - this is not what happened.
Great Package.     On: 2001-05-21

This is an example of Kodaks best effort to bring film camera buyers into the digital photo world. The 4800 looks and feels like a 35mm film camera, and offers dedicated user controls that will make transitioning users comfortable with digital cameras. The 4800 has spectacular resolution (true 3 megabyte) for perfect 8" x 10" printing, coupled with a very good optical 3x zoom. The CompactFlash memory cards are the best buy available today, with sizes that would allow for many hundreds of shots per card. When this camera is coupled with an inexpensive card reader (easier to use, but not absolutely necessary in light of the supplied USB cable on the 4800) and the user subscribes to any of the online photo printing services, the true beauty of digital photography is clear.
Very Professional     On: 2001-05-19

Having just retired from the Associated Press as a photographer and using the Canon and Nikon Digital cameras in my work, up to $15,000 each, I bought a DC4800 and love it. What a great camera and would transmit an image from it on the AP Photo wire if the situation and photo op came up.
Buy It!     On: 2001-05-15

Ive owned a lot of cameras (and still do), but this one is by far my favorite. The quality of the photos is excellent and its easy to use. I am on the leading edge of the Baby Boom and consequently need glasses for close-up, but this camera and the digital menus are easy enough to read without my glasses. I dont think you can go wrong if you purchase this camera.
Very happy I waited...     On: 2001-05-12

I searched and searched and searched for what-I-hoped-to-be-the "perfect" camera. It had to be flexible, allowing for simple point-and-shoot AND manual photography. I wanted to be able to use zoom, telephoto, and wide-angle lens. I wanted a LOT of pixels. I wanted it to be able to grow with my expertise. Finally, it had to be affordable.

Its not often you hit the ball out of the park in your first at-bat. The DC4800 is a great camera! I didnt buy it here (mine came with an extra battery and a 64MB CompactFlash card instead of 16MB), but I had to tell SOMEBODY! ;-) I was tossed between the Sony Mavica that writes to mini-CDs and this camera. The Mavica sells for $1300, and is only a 2.1 megapixel. The money I saved on the DC4800 went toward two extra batteries (4 total), a battery charger, an extra 64MB Compact Flash, an external USB card reader, and a trip to Boston for summer vacation!


Great Outdoor Shots So-So indoor.     On: 2001-05-12

I really love this camera. Its small compact and takes some really great shots...Outdoors indoors even with a flash it just doesnt get it right. I upgraded the firmware for the cam which improved the focusing slightly but not enough.
Nightmare     On: 2001-05-07

My experience with the 4800 has been really horrible. The software did not work (E-Mails were not sent and pictures did not print as promised). I waited 45 minutes to speak to a customer service representative about this issue. They had no idea what was wrong, but agreed to send me the "updated" software. They refused to send it by express mail so I had to wait over a week to send the pictures that were the real reason for buying the camera. It was such a disappointment.

After installing the new software, E-Mails sent through the Kodak software are now delivered , but I still cannot print in the format of the photopaper furnished with the camera. The software is unstable. Pictures selected for printing, for example, suddenly are eliminated.

When I E-Mailed Kodak about these issues, customer service said "I suspect that you will find similar hold times if you purchase a competitors product, since were pretty much all in the same boat." It seems that Kodak is shooting for pretty low goals in providing service.

The battery life is extremely short so add the price of new batteries to the purchase price.


Lots of Bang for the Buck!
by: Anonymous    On: 2001-05-01

I am very pleased with my new DC4800! Kodak has put in a lot of quality options that will please both the novice and expert photographer! It is easy to use, lightweight, and fun to take pictures with. Compared to other brands in this class, Kodak seems to have better quality pictures than any other camera I have used or seen. My only disappointment is that the camera didnt come with a carrying case.
Wonderful Camera     On: 2001-04-18

I have shot 35mm for decades. A few years ago I got tired of lugging my SLR outfit around and started using good quality P&S autofocus cameras which did a generally good job but fell short in flexibility and indoor flash capabilities. I tried out a Kodak DC 215 last Fall to see if digital was for me. I really liked the advantages of digital, but realized I needed a 3-megapixel camera to get the quality I wanted. The DC 215 also offered no more flexibility than my P&S cameras. I narrowed my choices to the Kodak DC 4800, the Olympus C-3000 and the Nikon Coolpix 880. I finally bought the Kodak due to the current pricing. I feel this is the best bargain in a 3-megapixel camera right now.

The DC 4800 actually provides all the needed traditional film camera flexibility I want in a much more manageable outfit than my old SLR. When you register the camera on the ..., they will send you a ... lens adapter free. I plan to get the telephoto lens and with the built in zoom lens I will have nearly all the focal lengths I had with my SLRs three lenses and 2X tele-extender - all in a form factor that fits in a fanny pack.

I downloaded the firmware version 1.04 and have had no trouble with low light focusing. I have had excellent results with picture quality and my results continue to improve as I learn to use all of the cameras features.

There has been some criticism of the flash. The DC 4800s flash capabilities are at least as good as my P&S cameras, which I realize is ... with faint praise, but this cameras features allow you to easily overcome this limitation. Heres what you do: Buy an inexpensive tilt head automatic flash ( I got the Vivitar 2000, under ... at the countrys largest retailer), and then purchase a flash shoe bracket that attaches to the tripod mount on the camera. This costs ... for a straight bar or about ... for an L bracket. If your local camera store doesnt have these, they are available on-line. Plug the flash into the cameras flash terminal. The extremely handy f-stop selection dial can be set to 5.6 for straight flash or 2.8 for bounce flash (I have always had better results with bounce). One caveat: As the lens zooms in, the f-stop setting will close down somewhat - I find you can zoom 1x to 1.3 x before this happens. Usually indoors this is not a problem as you can move closer to your subject instead of increasing the zoom. Bottom line is I get the same flash quality and convenience as on my SLR for only a ... investment - try this on most consumer digital cameras!


I LOVE THIS CAMERA!     On: 2001-04-17

One picture speaks 1,000 words! Take look at some pictures I took using Kodak DC4800: http://community.webshots.com/user/dimitrisokolenko

(album "Kodak DC4800 test")


Awesome
by: Anonymous    On: 2001-04-02

This is my first, and possibly last, digital camera. I wont need another. This thing is AWESOME! But do the camera justice and yourself a favor, get a photo quality printer.
Superb digitial camera with very few flaws     On: 2001-03-29

PROS: Vivid colors, astonishing picture quality and details, great design and ergonomics, USB connection

CONS: Battery drains fast, bad focus in low-light conditions

Kodaks DC4800 gives you easy access to manual functions, offers a direct USB connection to download photos to desktop and notebook, more sturdy than other cheap cameras, accurate colors that rivals film cameras. Having access to higher resolutions (such as 3.1 mega pixels) is is important as well, b/c you want your picture to be sharp and crisp.

Ergonomics are great and your hands will feel at home when using it! The casing feels very solid, but the two plastic doors (for connectivity and the memory card) looks like they could break at any time.

Here are the functions accessible manually: - Self-timer: to chose the moment your camera will triggers itself. - Burst mode: to take 4 pictures in sequence (at the lowest picture quality, you can take up to 16). - Landscape: to prevent the camera from focusing on a near subject and have the horizon in focus. - Close-up: To let the camera adjust the focus to take a subject between 0.7-2.3 feet in great details. - Flash and flash settings: Will let you chose between flash, no flash, red-eye - Exposure compensation (from -2 to +2): This will let you chose to over- or underexpose your subject, to adapt to various light conditions. - Aperture (f/8, f/5.6, f/2.8): You can decide on the depth of field, so that you can have sharpness and blurriness where you like it on your photos. You can also choose P for the automatic settings to take over. - Zoom in/out: You get a 3x physical zoom, and also a 2x digital (which adds up to the 3x automatically when you press the zoom button long enough). You could also choose to block your camera from entering the digital zoom mode, to prevent yourself from using it (I have yet to see a photo which benefited the use of the digital zoom... theyre always grainy, not only with the Kodaks digital zoom, but with all those I tried).

The Kodak DC4800 comes with a 16 mb Compact Flash memory card, which is a complete nonsense for a 3.1 mega pixels camera. You should buy at least 64 MB. Amazon has great prices on this.

The BAD part of the DC4800 is its inability to focus in low-light conditions. It rarely focuses on the subject but looks for any source of light and focus at that point.

The main complaint with the DC4800 goes to the battery.Kodaks proprietary Li-Ion battery thats used in the DC4800 doesnt impress at all. With the LCD on, it doesnt last more than 40 pictures, after which the LCD turns itself off. Get a charger and solve your problems.

ALL digital cameras have their shortfalls, but this one has the least. Its simply amazing when you consider the price!


Superb digitial camera with very few flaws     On: 2001-03-28

PROS: Vivid colors, astonishing picture quality and details, great design and ergonomics, USB connection

CONS: Battery drains fast, bad focus in low-light conditions

Kodaks DC4800 gives you easy access to manual functions, offers a direct USB connection to download photos to desktop and notebook, more sturdy than other cheap cameras, accurate colors that rivals film cameras. Having access to higher resolutions (such as 3.1 mega pixels) is is important as well, b/c you want your picture to be sharp and crisp.

Ergonomics are great and your hands will feel at home when using it! The casing feels very solid, but the two plastic doors (for connectivity and the memory card) looks like they could break at any time.

Here are the functions accessible manually: - Self-timer: to chose the moment your camera will triggers itself. - Burst mode: to take 4 pictures in sequence (at the lowest picture quality, you can take up to 16). - Landscape: to prevent the camera from focusing on a near subject and have the horizon in focus. - Close-up: To let the camera adjust the focus to take a subject between 0.7-2.3 feet in great details. - Flash and flash settings: Will let you chose between flash, no flash, red-eye - Exposure compensation (from -2 to +2): This will let you chose to over- or underexpose your subject, to adapt to various light conditions. - Aperture (f/8, f/5.6, f/2.8): You can decide on the depth of field, so that you can have sharpness and blurriness where you like it on your photos. You can also choose P for the automatic settings to take over. - Zoom in/out: You get a 3x physical zoom, and also a 2x digital (which adds up to the 3x automatically when you press the zoom button long enough). You could also choose to block your camera from entering the digital zoom mode, to prevent yourself from using it (I have yet to see a photo which benefited the use of the digital zoom... theyre always grainy, not only with the Kodaks digital zoom, but with all those I tried).

The Kodak DC4800 comes with a 16 mb Compact Flash memory card, which is a complete nonsense for a 3.1 mega pixels camera. You should buy at least 64 MB. Amazon has great prices on this.

The BAD part of the DC4800 is its inability to focus in low-light conditions. It rarely focuses on the subject but looks for any source of light and focus at that point.

The main complaint with the DC4800 goes to the battery.Kodaks proprietary Li-Ion battery thats used in the DC4800 doesnt impress at all. With the LCD on, it doesnt last more than 40 pictures, after which the LCD turns itself off. Get a charger and solve your problems.

ALL digital cameras have their shortfalls, but this one has the least. Its simply amazing when you consider the price!


AWESOME camera     On: 2001-03-20

I love my DC4800. I consider myself to be an above average amateur photographer, and this is my first digital camera purchase. I like the flexibility for things like adjusting exposure and meter weighting. Photos I have taken with it have already been printed professionally in a theter pogram and came out really really well. The DC4800 takes fabulous pictures and was a great value as compared to the other 3 MP camras out there. In particular, it takes better low-light photos than the other 3 MP camera I have used (Nikon Coolpix 950) My two minor complaints:
1) Power button is VERY close to the shutter release. If you hand a stranger this camera to take your picture, you have to explain it to them, because half the time they will turn off the camera instead of taking your picture.
2) The software is a bit difficult to get started with. Like another reviewer said, be sure and download the firmware upgrade to improve the low-light focusing. Also, I could not get the camera to connect to my PC with the included software. Once I downloaded the latest version, it worked like a charm. I blame it on Windows more than Kodk, but still...
Great price vs performance deal     On: 2001-03-15

After shopping around, I found the Kodak DC 4800 to be the best price versus performance deal on a mid level digital camera. The hi quality picture (3.1 MP), USB transfer, manual vs automatic settings and powerful lithium ion battery are usually found on much more expensive cameras.

Obviously for any camera buff image quality is paramount. The DC 4800s high resolution pictures will blow up to 8x10 easily, and even up to 11x14 with a good quality shot. There are a large number of controls that allow the user to adjust for a particular look (saturated color, neutral color, b&w, filtered) or for unique lighting. We found that the image quality on this camera was excellent compared to the other digital cameras that we tried out. Some of our shots showed some aliasing (jagged lines) in compressed modes. However, it disappeared once the images were shot in uncompressed mode (and without digital zoom). As noted by other reviewers, getting the firmware upgrade from the kodak website is important for the quality of low light shots.

Another important feature is ease of use. The camera software is easy to install, the manual is well written and the placement of most common shot settings on a dial on top of the camera is very helpful. I wanted simple point and shoot, which this camera easily supports. On the other hand, my girlfriend is a commercial artist and wanted to be able to operate with manual settings on a traditional camera. Both of us are very happy using the camera.

The only negatives are lack of twain compliance, the small memory card and the long battery charging time:

- TWAIN is an industry standard interface that will allow you to connect your camera directly to numerous photo imaging software packages. This is not supported by the DC 4800 so most file transfers are a two step process. - A 16 MB compact card will only hold 10-15 images with standard compression. ... The battery charger takes four hours. A faster charger is available with a second battery but again it costs a little much

Overall, this was a great deal (note it pays to shop around as the price on the camera varies greatly) for a camera that will grow with your experience. From day one, you will get great quality shots and as you become more confident, you can manually adjust many functions to produce your own look.


A great value for the features     On: 2001-03-14

I am definitely not a professional photographer. I did some online research and the DC4800 came out way ahead comparing features to price. At 3.1 megapixels, a 16 meg CF card, 3x optical zoom, etc. this camera is great for your first or second digital camera purchase. If you are comparing features, put a great deal more weight on optical zoom capabilities over digital zoom. Digital zoom is more of a marketing feature than a real one. When a photo is digitally zoomed, all it is really doing is making the photo look bigger in the LCD (viewer) but this has a negative effect on the resolution.

As a novice user, I found the automatic settings worked really well (from a novice point of view). However, I believe the manual settings will meet our needs as well. The menus on the LCD are very easy to read, even in sunlight. This is something Ive had trouble with on other devices.

We tested our new camera at a conference in Anaheim. This meant that we used it in a wide variety of lighting senarios, ranging from indoor/night/mood lighing of a restaurant to outdoors at Disneyland with bright sunshine. Having used a Canon S100 in similar scenarios, I can tell you that the DC4800 performed tremendously better than the S100. Indoor pictures rarely required the use of the flash, although pics using the flash tended to wash out a great deal. However, this was easily fixed by adjusting the white balance. Overall, we were very happy with our photos.

I have to admit that our originally purchased camera had to be returned to because it had severe focusing problems, [....] Our replacement unit performed much better and we are happy with our choice.

A couple of tips for this camera:

- Our lens cap has trouble staying on. We may purchase another one.... along with an idiot cord to keep us from losing it[g].

- While we thought the battery life was very good, we will be purchasing a second battery and charger -- specially since the camera takes 4 hours to charge the battery (with no camera use while charging but the stand alone charger takes only a hour.

- The 16 meg CF card that comes with this camera will not be enough. Consider purchasing the biggest card you can afford.

Overall, I like this camera.


Nearly perfect     On: 2001-03-13

First of all, all the great reviews here and on other sites for this camera are well-deserved. I will not waste more time repeating what others have said, except to say that the flash works as well or better than any point and shoot 35mm I have used before. However, the flash does tend to wash out color, which you can compensate for by manually adjusting the white balance, which is excellent on this camera, or by not using a flash and taking a longer exposure. I recommend the latter, and was very surprised at how sensitive the camera was in fairly low light. Certainly far more sensitive than my P.O.S. film camera. Battery life is a big issue for all dig cams, and I would say that if you do nothing to save battery life, you get about 2-3 hours of continuous use from one charge. If you turn off the LCD and don¡¯t use the flash, you will extend this a great deal. I am not sure how much more life this gives you, as the battery never ran out when I did this, but it is at least four hours. Your expectations for the battery should be similar to a laptop or a camcorder, and this battery works as well or better than most. As for complaints about the lens cap not attaching to the camera body, you don¡¯t have to be MacGuyver to figure out that a piece of string about 8 inches long should solve this problem. Pros: easy use right out of the box (after 4 hours to charge the battery), excellent manual, super images, fast download to PC, image control (white balance, exposure, aperture, color saturation, uncompressed TIFF option for really high res). Able to accommodate additional lenses with the adapter that you get free for registering the camera. Price is a plus, esp. now with the $100 rebate. Shop around and you can find this camera for... after rebate. Cons: memory card is comically, if not criminally, insufficient. At max resolution, one picture will be 9MB. The included card is 16MB. To state the obvious, this would give you ONE pic at max res. Using minimal compression, files are ~2MB. What is the point of having 3MP power if you can¡¯t use it? You need a bigger memory card, the EZ upgrade comes with a 64MB card and an extra battery for less than the price of the card alone. NB, the battery charger is not included in this package. The included software is not very good, to be kind. It is functional if you have no alternative, but I would say that Photoeditor is far superior and Photodeluxe or photoshop are too superior to even compare. Also, the camera software is not compatible with windows NT. You can buy a card reader for pretty cheap to overcome this, which you might want to buy anyway to avoid always connecting/disconnecting the camera from the PC. Overall: Buy this camera with the extra battery, charger, and larger memory and you will probably have no complaints.
big dissappointment     On: 2001-02-28

I own the 290 wich is a great camera and bought the 4800 hoping for better resolution and smaller size. My new 4800 doesnt work right, when watching the LCD panel it changes colors into green with no reason. Even if I touch the camera all turns to green....My concern is that there is no way I can contact Kodak on line and explain the problem. When buying a product with a big defect like this one and you are out of town, you are lost. The store that sold me the camera will have to replace it or what? Kodak should have a site where I can speak out, thanks to amazon I can do so.
Awesome Camera - Get the Firmware Update though     On: 2001-02-27

I received this camera friday afternoon, and by sunday night I had taken 200 pictures. Let me tell you, this camera is AWESOME. One word of caution though, GET THE FIRMWARE UPDATE FROM KODAK.COM as SOON as you get the camera. The update fixes an autofocus issue that can leave some lower light and indoor pictures grainier in appearance than they should. Also, buy the battery and charger. The charger will fully charge a battery in about an hour, while the the camera/AC adapter takes over four. It is very nice to have that extra battery too. Also, splurge and get a bigger cf card too, 16MB just doesnt cut it anymore. I admit, I am a camera novice. Still, this camera will deliver the goods in full automatic mode. The LCD is well readable in direct sunlight and the ON-TO-SHOOT time is the best Ive seen. This is a truely great little (and light) digital camera.
Great picture quality, but battery is a headache.     On: 2001-02-18

The pictures are not as clear as the ones from a medium-format Hassleblad, nor is the color as brilliant as the one from professional photo albums. Yet, in picture quality, this Kodak 4800 beats all the other digicams Ive used under $1,000. The $5,000 Nikon D1 may have better color saturation, but I have to wait until I save that amount of money.

In addition to picture quality, the price is excellent and the cameras portability may attract many more users. A fully charged battery lasts about 35 pictures (with the LCD panel turned to Power Save Off). I suggest taking pictures with the LCD panel completely turned off. According to PC World, one can take 171 pictures this way.

In spite of all its pros, the battery system is designed for use near home and in North America only. If you travel abroad, good luck finding a UL-certified step-down transformer with proper plugs and sockets. Also, if you want to take the camera out on a moments notice, you have to wait four hours until the battery is fully charged. In summary, the battery system for Kodak 3400 that uses 4 AA batteries is a more sensible one, though that may add a little weight to the machine.


Great camera, Outstanding Support     On: 2001-02-01

After reading the reviews for all 3.1 Megapixels cameras for a few weeks, I bought Kodak DC4800. I need a camera for panoramic picture and there arent too many wide-angle digital camera. I also need a camera to take close-up pictures in low light. I have to say that DC4800 exceeds all my expectations. The pictures taken outdoor or indoor are gorgeus. The macro shots are GREAT. I would definitely recommend buying this camera. While I had some problems with USB download with a Mac computer (but not with a Windown machine), Kodak is actually sending me a flashcard reader for FREE! What a great company and I am extremely pleased with the camera and its technical support.
A powerful camera     On: 2001-01-23

Ive looked at quite a few digital cameras both online and in stores, but I never found one that even comes close to the "manual" feel of this camera. If you know how to take pictures, youll really appreciate the way this camera enables you to control aspects like shutter speed that most digital cameras insist on controlling themselves.

I took pictures in total darkness (with the flash of course) and they came out perfectly. I took low-light shots with a longer shutter setting (no flash) and those came out well too. I took action shots, still shots, light-saturated, low-light, indoor, outdoor, with people, with distant scenery, and more... All came out as well as could be expected from any analog camera.

The USB connection is fairly straight-forward though it could use a better user interface. The battery does get drained pretty quickly, so you cant just leave the camera on as you walk around on a tour. But its only flaws (besides a cheap lens cap) can be fixed with an extra battery and larger compact flash. All around though, I havent seen a digital camera yet that can even compete.


Excellent     On: 2001-01-11

I love this camera. It takes clear, crisp images. It offers quite a bit of creative control to the more advanced photographer.

Quite frankly, short of buying a $6,000 Kodak professional digital camera, this is the best deal I found.

3x optical zoom is a definite selling point. Never believe digital zoom ratings on cameras, while they might enlarge the image, they lose clarity and sharpness. Most other cameras out there offer 2x optical, and 3x digital. This camera has 3x optical, and 2x digital. A definite advantage.

The Li-ion battery is an advantage and a disadvantage. It has a nice long life, and it is certainly more environmentally friendly). It is definitely cost effective, digital cameras eat batteries. But, there is one problem. It is not easy to just pick up and charge on the road. If you plan on taking the camera away from power outlets, buy a spare battery and charger. With regular batteries, any newstand can sell them to you. The spare battery isnt cheap. But, it is worth it. It will pay for itself in about 10 sets of batteries (not long if you take a lot of pics).


Great camera for the price.
by: Anonymous    On: 2001-01-09

I got this camera for my mother. She loves it. Its easy enough for her to use and its packed with features.
Great Camera     On: 2001-01-09

I am an old 35mm photographer and output is my main concern. I agree with PC Mag. who rated the DC4800 the #1 output in the over $500 range. If you are looking for all the bells and whistles, go elsewhere. This is a easy to use, user friendly camera. Took the flash card down to a local pro camera store and when the image came up on their screen, they wanted to know what camera was used as they were really impressed. This has all the options I need. Dont want movies or sound, I have a digital video camera for that. I have no complaints at all on this digital camera. Well... ok, attach the lens cover and I am totally happy.
This is the reason to venture into digital imaging     On: 2000-11-26

Well here goes. At my place of employment I was able to sell, repair and, most importantly, educate myself with digial imaging. I played around with some of the earlier Kodaks and Olympus models. When I got my hands on this machine last summer I was AMAZED. Not only was it simple to use, with an automatic function that finds the perfect shudder speed and ISO seeting, it also took phenomenal pictures. Although, I do not use the auto feauture anymore, it is ideal for amatures. The 3.1 megapixel quality is amazing. You truly come to appreciate the detail you get, untill you realize this camera picks up even the slighest blemish, pore, or discoloration on your skin! The detail is phenomenal. As some of my coworkers say, "When you view the photograph, "Youll find things on your skin that you never knew existed." I am impressed with this camera, as it has served me well for a couple of months now. Id say, for the price, this is the best camera for your money. Well done, Kodak!
indoor image problems call customer support.     On: 2000-11-23

I also had problems with poor quality indoors images until I talked to Kodaks customer support (5 stars to them also). Now that I know how to handle the camera its takes great pictures indoors or out.
Absolutely great camera     On: 2000-11-14

First off--Im spoiled, photographically: for years Ive loved using good 35mm Minolta, Nikons and large format film cameras, mainly as an amateur photographer, but also as a freelance from time to time. When I took the digital plunge, I thought this camera would be more of a supplement to my other cameras. I was wrong--now I usually take the Kodak with me and leave the others behind. In short, this is just a great camera, which Ive had for about two months now. It can be a bit complex to set up, and on "Program" the results are predictably just OK, but once you use it like a film camera the results are incredible. The control over many photographic settings--and the way Kodak has translated digital controls into "35mm film" settings(like ISO settings, effective focal lengths and such)--is simply fantastic. Its small enough to take with me when a full-blown 35mm Nikon setup is just too bulky (like when Im biking); it also produces pictures that rival the 35mm. At first, I thought the indoor flash was a bit weak; you can hook up another set of flashes, however, for serious lighting. More importantly, I also found that when I set the camera properly for flash (fill works well, for instance), and proper ISO settings, that I got much better results. The macro and distance settings are effective as well, though Im not sure why you need the distance setting with an autofocus camera. Flaws? Only in packaging--I wish that Kodak had included a case and neutral lens filter, but thats a very small complaint.
Pictures have great balance and color
by: Anonymous    On: 2000-11-08

Very convenient controls. Any photographer will gert used to this camera in a few minutes, because it is designed as conventional cameras.

But most important is that the pictures really outshine others. I have compared this camera to the best 3+Mpixel cameras, and although in some areas it was not the best, the overall picture quality was consistantly the best....


Excellent camera     On: 2000-10-22

After reading some of the negative reveiws, I felt I had to respond. Having used and tried many digital cameras including the Canon 3030 and Nikon 990, I can tell you that for the price you cannot buy a better camera. The problems with focusing that people complain about is that they probably did not have the focus set properly. There is a macro and infinity setting that has to be set correctly. I know because I had that problem at first but it was my fault. I use the camera in the OR all the time and NEVER have a problem with the focus. As far as the batteries, Kodak did it right. I can easily take 40 high quality pictures using the LED without recharging and the batteries are less than half the weight of 4 AA batteries. The Canon doesnt even include rechargeable batteries for $999. The controls are so user friendly that I can show the nurses how to take great pictures for me in 2 minutes. Try that with the Canon which is way too confusing or even the bulky Nikon 990. I dont understand the "problem" with the flash - it works well to 10 ft which is all it was meant for. The best part about the flash is that I can take pictures from 1 ft away and not overexpose the picture. All in all, it is a great compact 3 megapixel camera at a great price.
Excellent Camera
by: Anonymous    On: 2000-10-16

I recently acquired a DC4800. This is truly a great camera and compared to other digital cameras I used it is really good. The camera look and feel is much the same as a normal "old" camera, but with the feature a full fledge digital camera. Its always fun when people as you `when are you going to change the film? The viewfinder sits slightly on an awkward position but I dont find it irritating and one can still use the back panel display to preview the image. Picture quality is great at 3 MP and even good when working at lower resolution -yes sometimes we have to go there-. The lition-ion battery is a great feature, and makes the whole camera lighter, easier to use (you can recharge when ever you want) and one gets a lot more battery life out of these babies, than normal nickel metal hydrates. Just for interest sake on one occasion I took 90 picture, with the flash on, with one battery.

All an all it is truly a great camera for people who are starting with digital imagery and like some advance feature to play around with. It also has the work and feel of a normal camera. Hope you enjoy yours.


Awesome Camera but take a power converter with you to Europe     On: 2000-10-14

I bought the DC4800 just prior to a trip to Europe. The pictures were excellent until I went to recharge the batteries. Unfortunately, the cameras charger was only 110v. I ignorantly assumed the camera had a 110/220v recharger just like my computer, razor, video camera, alarm clock, and cell phone charger. Since MOST high end electronics have a 110/220 transformer built in, I assumed as much from this camera.

To make a long story short, my batteries ran down by the 5th day of a 17 day trip and I was unable to find a transformer in Europe to step the voltage down to 110v. Therefore, I had to resort to the good old 35mm. I blame myself for this mistake, but I think that Kodak should provide a universal 110/220 charger for [this] camera.


Best Kodak yet     On: 2000-10-12

I have owned a Kodak DC260, 280 and 290 and have enjoyed all of them, each being a little better in picture quality as the model number increased, but were lacking manual controls for when a great picture setting required it. That problem is gone with the DC4800. Sure, you can still take an automatic picture, but expect similar results that of its predecesors. Flip it to manual and experiment a little, this camera can deliver a picture that will rival the best that 35mm can offer. Simply awesome! Also in regards to batteries, standard AA would certainly have been cheaper but can not provide the same longevity or power capabilty that a lithium can provide (How many laptops do you see running AA batteries?)With lithium batteries, this camera can process three times as fast as my DC290. Bottom line, the difference between this camera and other Kodak cameras is that this one will take a little longer to figure out and seems to be geared for the serious amateur, but is definitely worth the extra time and money. I simply love it! If you are looking for an automated DC, I prefer the DC290, it seems to provide a better overall consistent shot for this mode.
Everything I thought I wanted and more.
by: Anonymous    On: 2000-10-06

I wouldnt write a review except I read some of the negative reviews below. All I can say is these people must have gotten a lemon from the first day of the assembly line or something. I bought the 4800 and it is awesome. The autofocus on mine was the first thing that impressed me when I looked at the output. It has not occured to me it has ever made a mistake. The depth of field is impressive. The thing is laid out perfectly and fits my hand like a glove. The low light capability is like a spy camera out of a movie. The pictures, the most important thing, which come out of this camera are very very nice.

The default color choice out of the box I guess is suppose to emulate kodachrome. Sometimes it is a little too much, but the camera has a easy override which takes neutral coloration pictures when you want them. I think people and their clothes look better with the saturated color on but when you need accurate color it can be yours immediately. The zoom has a stop before it gets to the digital, it isnt that hard to detect it for me. The flash works with the auxiliary lenses which block the nikon 990.

I will say that while the flash is not physically blocked with any of the auxiliary lenses, the professional quality wide angle lense is very large and does cast a shadow on wide angle shots of art work in the lower right corner from a distance of three or four feet. How many times you use wide angle lenses in a dark room from four feet with the flash will determine how big a problems this is. The camera has such good low light capability you can, I feel, get around this.

The batteries are suppose to be expensive. Why? because they allow you to shoot, with the LCD ON, 40 pictures or so without a problem. The cheap AA batteries belong on a cheap camera. This is suppose to be a nice camera and have a power system that has some oomph. It does. This camera should be about 1100 dollars with the other top prosumer cameras. That it costs only what it does is the achievement to fixate on.


Great expectations 95 % fulfilled...     On: 2000-09-20

Ive read several reviews of the Kodak DC4800 and agree with most of the positive reviews and very little of the negative ones...

Now, prospective wise, this is my very first digital camera so I can offer my opinion with no previous digital camera experience. I have used several upper high end 35mm cameras in my life and do know a little more than your average shooter; with that in mind, I will continue with my review.

First of all, I got much more than I actually expected. All of my enlargments and prints have been done on my HP Deskjet 970CXI printer with Kodak Glossy Inkjet 45 pound paper...some were enlarged and printed from the lowest megapixel level (.8) and others were done with the highest megapixel (3.1) The results have been much better than expected...the color was terrific and the detail was excellent.

The only pictures I took which I considered below excellent quality were, for the most part, due to my mistakes regarding settings, movement when shooting in low light and perhaps greater expectations from the flash than you would normally get with a good 35mm camera...now, a couple of the reviews have mentioned that the flash and focus when taking pictures inside or with low light were far below the quality they were expecting. They may well have a point, however, I attributed these lower quality shots more to my inexperience with the camera and wrong settings than I actually was willing to blame on the camera....when I became more familiar with the limits of the camera, I was able to overcome 95 % of my original poorer quality shots...in other words, when I actually understood the limitations of the camera, I was able to take much better photos with clearly focused shots and excellent color...

Now, a word about expectations; I never really counted on any camera giving me 100 % of everything I expected...it just isnt reality. Different cameras within different price ranges simply are not going to hit our needs 100 % of the time. With my zero level experience with digital cameras and years of amateur level 35mm work, I simply was willing to forgive a few shortcomings if I got what I consider excellent pictures 95 % of the time.

Some have commented on the lame flash which is built into the camera...I never actually expected a lot from it so I was not disappointed when the shots taken from more than ten feet were not as good as one might expect. On the other hand, the camera does have a connection to attach a higher end external flash unit so I would tend to think that even this objection might be overcome if one were to use a good external flash unit. I would be interested in hearing some reports. Like any other camera shooting in low light, if it drops to a longer shutter speed, you had better keep it still or go to a tripod for more stability. I actually attributed a couple of my poor shots to this rather than a focus problem.

Having said the above, I do consider myself a novice digital photograpy buff, however, I can tell you, if you want a camera which is a whole lot of fun and gives you excellent options to venture more into creative control, I would consider getting one. If, however, you are expecting an end all, do all, camera, I seriously doubt if you can find one on the market. Perhaps the extremely high end professional cameras can give you lots of what your looking for, however, I tend to think that even they have limitations...


Battery Drain on Your Pocket
by: Anonymous    On: 2000-09-16

Kodak should have stayed with standardized batteries on this one. If you need an extra or eventually will need to replace the Lithium Ion Battery Pack, plan to spend BIG bucks. If the Battery Pack runs low, you have to either stop what you are doing for an hour while you charge up the battery while in the camera. Or pay a LOT extra for an external charger and extra battery. If Kodak used standardized batteries, Id give it 3 more stars. Paul
The worst Kodak digital camera     On: 2000-09-13

A great camera in many areas. It is handy and full of features. However, there are several major problems that makes DC4800 almost unuseable: 1. The flash is so weak that you cannot really use it for good indoor result. 2. Under a good indoor lighting environment,the camera cannot auto focus properly when zoom in. The subjust is always out of focus and the subjusts behind are clear. 3. When adjusting the optical zoom to the telephoto setting, the digital zoom automatically comes on without any warning. The zoom is very annoying to use. 4. The delete pictures function from the software CD does not work properly.
Big Fault in System Specs     On: 2000-09-12

Having started using Kodak digital camera since the DC120 was launched I was delighted and ranked Kodak as the best in the field consistently.

However, the recent purchase of DC4800 led to disappointment, as there are two major problems apparently due to the specification error at design stage.

1. Out-of-focus when pictures is taking indoor under normal environment with or without flash. This is due to the new design of the auto-focusing function, which uses a diode (CD) to detect distance and exposure, unlike the previous models that were using Infrared. The CD technology is fine as many SLRs do use diodes to assist AF and Exposure, however, there are faults in the current design that leads to picture taken indoor completely out-of-focus.

2. The software available to be used in the computer for picture handling has a problem with the Delete function, which does not work properly. It works in one instance and fail in another. The software I used is for the Apple Mac G3 computer.

The first problem has resulting the camera unusable in many circumstances and it is a serious fault. Is there anybody out there experience the same problems?


poor replacement for the 290     On: 2000-09-09

I read with amazement the reviews of the 4800 already posted. I owned all the Kodak digitals starting with the 210 and ending with the 290. I to wanted a digital with 3 plus million pixels of resoulution so I patiently waited for the release of the 4800. What a disappointment it was when the first of three came. Yes I had three and all three were returned due to results mainly but poor design also enetered into the decision. First it is to small, 2nd has a lens cap that cannot be attached to the camera even though it has two holes in the lens cap. Batteries are expensive and dont due any more than the AA Recharables the 290 used. Flash is a pop up flash which is just one other thing you have to remember to activate if needed instead of being intergrated like the 290 was. But the real bottom line is the results -they are not as good as the 290. I had taken a week before with the 290 pictures of my new car. I took the same picture with the 4800 and then printed both off with the Epson 900. The 290 print was far better than the 4800 and that is not acceptable especially with a 3.1 res. I now own a Epson 3000Z which is built along the lines of an SLR and the results are what I expected from the 4800. The Sierra Image software included is great. Kodak had the best in the 290-all they had to do was improve the 290 with increased resolution and they would have had another winner.
My first Digital Camera Kodak DC4800
by: Anonymous    On: 2000-09-03

I have read and studied the features on just about every digital camera available. I had even ordered this cameras predessor when I saw an ad in our Sunday paper anouncing the DC 4800. I changed my order and I am really glad I did so. This camera performs as advertised. The photographic quality at all resolutions meets or exceeds comparable photos I have seen by several other top manufacturers. I have taken appx 200 pictures with the camera so far. I have failed to exhaust battery life in any one session. (This was one of my original concerns about getting a digital camera.) I have also purchased a 96MB flash card. For my purposes this is overkill. Even at highest resolution, in any compression mode, 64 MB should be enough for the average outing. Of course, if TIFF configuration is desired get the most you can afford. This camera is much more than I expected. Operating instructions are excellent and easy to use. Follow Quick Start and youll be going in a few minutes. The photo software is easy to use but at novice level. But I guess that helped in keeping the price down. Most folks who own a scanner already have more advanced software anyway. Final Words: Boy, am I happy with camera.
simply amazing!     On: 2000-09-02

Ive only had this camera for a week, but Im extreamly happy with it. For basic point and shoot on low energy setting, it seems to do very well with battery life. But no matter, definitely buy an extra batter with charger (you can get it directly from Kodak if you cant find it here).

I agree with a previous reviewer where the extended lense is visible through the viewfinder. I havent received my extra lenses yet (wide angle, tele, closeup), but Im sure that will be even more of a problem with those. I suspect with lense attachments this is not uncommon. In those cases you may want to use the LCD screen for direct through the lense viewing anyway.

The 3.1 megapixel resolution is really, really nice. I cant believe I ever lived without it. When you printout a large format image, you can really see the difference. This aspect of course will be true of any 3.x MP camera. By the way, somewhat unrelated, dont bother using the digital zoom. The optical one is excellent, and for digital zooming, its better to do the very same effect in Photoshop where you have better control. I just turned that effect off on my camera which is a real nice thing to be able to do by the way.

The real excitement, however, happens when you venture into any of the manual settings. You have really nice control over white balance (e.g. setting Kelvins directly or adjusting based on known lighting, or adjusting based on a white card in the image, etc.), over color modes (sepia, B&W, several color modes), exposure metering, ISO, exposure settings, and shutter speeds. I think Kodak has done a real good job with these. It also puts some of the settings physically on the camera so you can adjust them without going into the menu (on the LCD screen) including f-stop, exposure compensation (handy to quickly deal with backlight subjects), distance/closeup (which forces a fixed focus), delayed snap, and burst mode. The burst mode is really cool, but I find it only interesting when using in the smallest resolution (1080x720) where you get a burst of 16 pictures.

What can I say, this is really fun. When my wide angle attachment arrives, I will also venture into using this along with my kaidan attachment for VR photography. The software is pretty reasonable and allows full control by an attached laptop in those professional situations where youre taking thousands of images for a VR tour. By the way, the included AC adapter will be a life saver in that case too. Also, if you really want to get exotic, Kodak makes all of the software development kits free so you can develop your own software to manage the camera or the resulting collection of images. But that is probably going a bit far for most people.


Amazing Performance, Great Value     On: 2000-08-31

In short, the camera performs terribly well. It is VERY fast, you can take several pictures in a row before buffer fills, and it is a very simple to use product.

But dont be fooled by its size, this monster has enough manual features to substitute a studio cam.

Camera is very sturdy, comes with everything you need, and in fact includes the great Arcsoft Panorama maker software, which is not mentioned anywhere. It created stunning panoramas and 360 degree views.

Complains: 16Mb is too little RAM. However, camera price is relatively low compared to all other 3 MPX ones.

Would recommend to get the expansion pack with it, which includes an extra battery, charger and a GREAT camera bag with enough space for all cables, accessories, etc.


advanced point and shoot     On: 2000-08-26

This is Kodaks entry into the 3 megapixel market (and some reports indicate that this is the first of Kodaks digital cameras to be designed by Kodak Japan), and considering that Kodak did so well at 2MP with the DC280, one expects a formidable digital camera, and gets it, for the most part. This is my second Kodak digital camera and Ive continued to purchase Kodak because with digital cameras the camera is also the film and no one knows how to make film quite like Kodak, a la Kodachrome. The previous DC280 is a point and shoot camera only, and while the DC4800 offers manual control of many functions, it still basicaslly a point and shoot camera - for instance, with the DC4800 no control of focus is possible, and if you want to change shutter speed you have to go through several levels of menu (no less than 10 button presses to get to the shutter speed menu and then as much as another 12 to choose the speed). Hopefully, as the digital era progresses digital cameras will become more like the SLRs of old with manual control of every function and all the controls on the body of the camera, rather then buried deep in menus. (I understand Olympus is about to release its E10 which is like a digital SLR; however the price will be about $2000.)

That given, lets examine the Kodak DC4800.

The positives -

For me, after the 3MP resolution and the 3X lens, what impresses me most about the DC4800 is the high quality, high contrast, high resolution, high brightness backpanel LCD, which is now truly useful, unlike that on the DC280. The backpanel controls have also been improved somewhat with a 4 axis "joy" button. The camera has a strap post on each side of the body so one can use a neckstrap; the wide/telephoto control is a "wiggle" switch under the thumb; and the viewfinder has a diopter control for those of us needing glasses. The DC4800 communicates with the computer through USB only (and unlike the DC280 can be used at the same time as other USB devices) and acts just like a flash card reader appearing to the computer as a external, removable drive, with the fast downloading of a reader. The front of the DC4800 lens is well protected, unlike the DC2800. The manual is typical Kodak well done, but strangely enough, as with the DC280 manual, the markings in the viewfinder are not explained. Exposure after pressing the shutter button in almost instantaneous and despite the larger file size of a 3MP file, saving the the file to the CF is considerably faster that the DC280. Digital zooom is surprisingly good, thanks to the 3MP high density.

The negatives -

I was very surprised to find that the lens barrel appears in the lower right corner of the viewfinder at 28mm; I dont know if this is not unusual for a point and shoot as Ive never owned one before, but I come close to finding it unacceptable. The battery situation with the DC4800 is not much improved so far as I can tell, even though the camera uses an expensive (proprietary?) Kodak lithium-ion battery; the user will surely have to invest in a $80 battery and charger kit if extended and away-from-the-home use in anticipated. Like the DC280, the battery cover of the DC4800 can be knocked open by a blow to the bottom of the camera body - those comtemplating active use should secure the battery cover with tape. The DC4800 is supplied with only a 16MB CF card and the buyer can expect to spend an additional $200+ on a large CF card, which along with the $80 extra battery and charger will amount to an additional $300+ investment. The camera acts only as a CF reader and is not TWAIN compliant, which leads to lots of inconveniences in saving files. The backpanel LCD gets dark in sunlight. As with the DC280, the tripod mount is plastic and apparently not intended for serious use.

One additional comment - those buying a digital camera should check back with the manufacturer for updated firmware - in Kodaks case there were lots of early complaints about battery life problems with the DC280 which were largely solved with later firmware.


Great Camera     On: 2000-08-14

Fell in love with a friends Kodak DC280 and started researching to see which camera would best suit me. Decided it was the DC4800 because of the high 3.1 megapixel resolution. It has performed wonderfully. Installation was extremely smooth and everything works as advertised. Lots of great features. I especially like the compact size and traditional camera looks. A few of the more commonly used settings are accessible without going through a menu (like exposure compensation, and apperture priority settings).

And I use Windows 2000 which the camera works with without exception.


The Best Digital Camera yet!     On: 2000-08-12

The picture quality on this camera is one of the best.(3.1 mega pixel) The file sizes are a little large but if you get a 64 or 128 flash card you will have plenty of space. You can set it to emulate 100 200 and 400 film quality. The lintium battery solves all the battery problems that the dc280 and dc290 had. The dc4800 is far more advanced then any other kodak camera. If your main priority is high quality photos this is the camera for you.

TotalBike | TakenDomains | aDogThing | TotalCamping | SoccerUp | Xbox 360 News and Podcast
Copyright © 1997-2008 hoZt.com All Rights Reserved