 Canon Optura 200MC MiniDV 1.3 Megapixel Camcorder By: Canon Average Rating: 4.0 Total Reviews: 13 More Information
On: 2005-09-30
I researched small camcorders for 3 months, July through September of 2002, to take for a week in London and three weeks in Scotland. I selected the Canon Optura 200 MC. It arrived in October and at 60 years of age, I practiced with it and it was easy to learn. We left on our trip in mid May of 2003. I took 1174 digital stills and 17 hours of mini DV tape in that month. The pictures I got were wonderful. I have received lots of compliments on the quality of both the stills and the video. I defy anyone to get better quality pictures with cameras that cost twice as much or more. I would not trade my camera for anything. When I finally am ready to purchase a camera in the future, I WILL buy another Canon. On: 2004-04-09
The price you see now on Amazon and other Amazon providers is way out of whack for what this camera is available for from other sources. I considered the Optura 300 and the Elura 50, but I already had a major investment in BP-500 series batteries and chargers. I also use an Optura Pi and a Rebel Digital. Be aware that the 300 and the 50 use other model batteries that are much less available and less robust than the 500 series batteries. I am a big believer in optical stabilization but that is becoming less important nowadays due to excellent electronic circuits. Getting to the camera, I also do not miss the accessory shoe as I bought this camera for two reasons. The battery compatibility as I mentioned and its small sized ergonomics. As other reviewers have mentioned, the rotating hand strap makes the camera comfy and very handy. My wife can throw it in a purse or I can keep it in the same bag as my digital rebel. And thats the point. Along with the Optura 300 and Elura series, this is a go virtually anywhere miniDV cam. The person that is comparing (and comparing poorly) the GL2 to this cam misses the entire point. 2 different cams for different purposes. I doubt that if you are considering a GL you are even looking at a compact cam. The GL and XL series cams are much much better than any of these. If you want a compact camera with optical image stabilization, with typical Canon engineering, optics and quality, this would be an excellent choice. But shop around for a deal because the Optura 300 is also very good (some would say better) and the Elura 50 is a budget minded compromise if thats what you need. On: 2004-01-21
Im by no means an enthusiast. My wife and I got this (based on on the reviews here) for our honeymoon and it did its job wonderfully. The instruction manual was hefty, but it was very easy to follow. The fact that it was small and compact really worked well for putting it in my carry-on for the airplane. Therefore not leaving me to worry about it getting ripped off by storing it in luggage. Also that it was both a digital camera and camcorder proved indespensable for light packing when heavy walking. We went to Istanbul and every shot we took turned out great. If the flash went off, all we had to do was gently place our finger over the top so it would not pop up. The sound quality was also very good. I have read where some had problems with motor noise coming from the machine but we never did. The only real complaint I have about this is the night vision with the camcorder portion. If you put it in the "extreme low light" mode, the video puts out a slow-motion blurry mess even moving the camera at a snails pace. Once again Im not an expert, the fact that the blurry mess is in color may mean something to those reading who are hobbyists. However I was able to get what I wanted in moderalty dim environments and at night in the city with the normal setting just fine. Where the low light setting pulled through was in the still pictures we took and thats what I wound up using it for. I recommend getting the largest battery offered for this model. Not only does it last forever but its great for balancing the camera for a steady shot. Get a larger memory card too. Great for beginners that leaves room for serious filmmaking. Glad we got it and recommend it. On: 2003-11-21
Ive been using this camera for almost a year. Ease of use is excellent. Quality of video much better than the Canon ZR series. I dont use it for still images, have a Sony DSC-F707, so I cant comment. Low light video performance is better than I expected. This model has yet to eat a tape or moisture check in 10 months. Ive used it skiing down the Rockies and treking through jungles. Of course, being a male, Im now looking at moving up to the Optura 300. On: 2003-09-08
The Optura 200MC is a good choice for three types of users. First, if you need a small camcorder with decent quality. I take this camcorder trail running and get great footage passing people while leaping over logs, etc. I simply couldnt carry a bigger camcorder some of the places my Optura 200MC goes.Second, my acting classmates borrow the camcorder to review rehearsals. Its easy for a student to "point and shoot" without training. The viewscreen is big enough, and the built-in speaker loud enough, for two or three students to gather around and watch. Third, I advise spending half (or less) of your video equipment budget on a camcorder. Budget plenty of money for audio gear, tripod, lights, computer and software for editing, etc. If this leaves only enough money for an Optura 200MC, buy it. Youll make better videos with an Optura 200MC and good accessories than with a GL2 or XL1S and no accessories. The Optura 200MC has three shortcomings. First, the built-in microphones are awful. You hear mostly motor noise. The Optura 200MC lacks a microphone hotshoe for adding an external mike. I bought Canons microphone mounting bracket, a Sony directional mike, an extension cable to use the mike for interviews, and two Sony wireless mikes. This totalled $400. I now get great audio, although the external mike and mounting bracket double the size of the camcorder. Second, the FireWire chip has failed twice, and the exposure manual control has failed once. Each repair takes a month. If you need a dependable camcorder, consider buying a more expensive camcorder. Third, the video quality is pretty good for a 1-chip camcorder. It has only two preset color balances, sunlight or incandescent light. On cloudy days, or with florescent lights, etc. the color balance is off unless you do a manual white balance. The color saturation is OK, not great. The lens sharpness is pretty good, and it handles low light better than youd expect. The automatic exposure uses a spot meter in the center of the frame. If you have a bright patch of snow or clouds in the center, everything else is too dark. Like the color balance, youll sometimes have to manually adjust the exposure. -- Thomas David Kehoe, author of "Hearts and Minds: How Our Brains Are Hardwired for Relationships"  by: Anonymous On: 2003-06-23
I purchased this camera a week ago around [$$$]. There were other electronic stores advertising this camera for around [$$$]. The next closest deal I found for a camera of this size, with 1.3 megapixel still picture and mini dv technology was around [$$$]. This camera is a steal! Ive had it for a week and what caught my attention initially was the quality of the construction. This camera is solid. The controls are well laid out and anything you need is at your fingertips. I have tested the still picture and mpeg to memory card features. Downloading the images and mpegs to the computer was as easy as easy could be. Although I havent printed any stills yet, I was surpised by the superior picture quality as it showed up on the monitor. The mpegs are a little weak, but if you need superior video on your computer, buy a firewall cable. Its not included, but at this price you should have plenty of money left over for accessories. Of the two negative reviews of this product, one refers to its high price tag, no longer a factor at over [%] off. The other isnt even reviewing this camera. The only negative I can find is I wish they included a dv camera to computer focus regarding the video in the same way they include instructions and features for the memory card. I.E. I wish they included the firewire. I know, WAAAAAAAAAA. This camera is two cameras in one, and two compact cameras at that. If you want to take pictures and videos of travel or everyday life but dont want to be bogged down by two cameras or bulkier cameras, this is the one for you.  by: Anonymous On: 2003-01-15
I just got this camcorder after lots of reasearch. Unlike what other people on here said, it is a great camera. The quality is awesome and the audio quality is also very good. It doesnt have an accessory shoe which is disappointing but you can buy an adapter from canon that attaches to the bottom. I have also taken some great stills with it and made a VCD slide show with them, many of the people I showed it to thought the pictures were from a 3MP camera. Overall this camera is great and I am very happy with my choice, plus it is now at a much better price. I definitely recommend it to anyone. On: 2003-01-13
I have had this camera for over a month now, and have been using it in a variety of conditions, from candle-lit Christmas dinners to scenic outdoor settings, some of which from a moving vehicle. The Optura 200MC has been holding up quite well and pleasantly surprised me in many ways.The sharp and clear video is very impressive, even under less than optimal lighting conditions such as typical indoor settings. Although the image becomes somewhat grainy when lighting conditions deteriorate, remember that no camera performs well with poor lighting. The cameras automatic settings do an excellent job most of the times but fortunately the Optura leaves you with plenty of manual control to experiment and enjoy creative freedom. I was also impressed with the still image quality, especially for a camcorder. Mind you, many dedicated digital still cameras will take better pictures but I really appreciate the convenience of being able to take both high quality videos and decent stills, and only have to carry one compact machine. The sound from the built-in mic is good and comparable to other camcorders. As with most other up-rights, the mic tends to pick up some motor noise when filming in very quiet environments, but creating some "white background noise" such as a radio or TV playing softly, or adding an external mic should alleviate this problem. I really like the way the Optura 200MC feels in my hand, not in the least because of the comfortable grip belt which can angle to accommodate your grip on the camera. It definitely lacks the awkward feel so many other up-right camcorders possess. The camera is neither too heavy to hold it up for a long time, or too light to keep it stable. Buttons for manual functions (such as exposure, focus) are located on the back of the camera, which makes them easy to locate while recording. The camera body is made of magnesium except for a few plastic covers, and seems well built. Is there anything I didnt like? Well the Optura 200MC isnt cheap for starters, and I wish the powerful white LED to illuminate your objects could be turned on in any shooting mode to add that last little bit of manual control, but then Im being pretty picky. Personally I dont really miss the accessory shoe on the Optura 200MC, as adding accessories to a small camera such as the Optura makes it too bulky for my taste. Also note that many video lights have a limited reach and just turning on an extra lamp when filming inside usually gives a much better result, not to mention less drain on your battery! Overall, I have been very happy with this camera, and would highly recommend it to anyone looking for a high quality digital camcorder.  by: Anonymous On: 2003-01-09
I had doubts about the 200MC based on complaints about the changes from the 100MC. In the end I chose the 200MC because it suits my purpose. My subjects are usually outdoor/action and I was especially interested in the Progressive photo aspect along with video. Some may be disapointed with the departure of the built-in accessory shoe in favor of the built in flash and if you are shooting a lot of indoor video and dont care about the photo aspect this could be a big issue for you. This camcorder is pretty versatile. it is easy to mix images and video between media (tape or card) the USB port in addion to the DV and video connectors make it very easy to fire off a print, e-mail attachment or develop a full-blown video production via computer or VCR. I had no problems moving images and footage to my mac. (It comes with the usb cable but not the firewire cable, be warned.) There are compromises in all this clever versatility however. Dont expect brilliant photographic quality - there is noise but it is handy for getting just the right action shot without the bizarre distortion that sometimes appears in digicamera shots. I am new to video so have little to compare there but optimal quality seems to depend on selection of settings used which may mean actually reading the manual and experimenting. It did perform better than expected however on the dusky end of a snowy day with light colored moving subjects which would probably be a test for any camcorder. Low light, night , and supernight make good exposure adjustments but lose on movement. Better to get the bracket and light for any serious low-light action footage. It is light weight , may feel too small to someone with larger-size hands. Video Conferencing is another possibility with this camera apparently. On: 2002-12-29
I am actually a huge fan of Canon optics. When I first started searching for a DV camcorder, I looked at Canons. Then I realized that Canon does not know how to make a quality camcorder. The ZR series (all of them) suffer from tremendously bad audio, and the MC200 is a worse model than the MC100. Actually the MC100 was probably the best DV camera that Canon ever made, and it just so happens to be the one that is discontinued. Since I am so fond of Canon photo equiptment, I wrote this review hoping that Canon would hear its consumers cries, and fix thier awful camcorder problems. Do yourself a favor and stick with a Sony or Panasonic. They each offer solid audio, video, and features. On: 2002-12-19
I have ordered this camera but never actually used it so I cant say anything about how well it performs. This camera deserves a better rating than what other people have given it because some of them havent even used it and have given it 1 star. From all the professional reviews I have read this has proven to be a great camera, I have been reasearching digital camcorders for months and this is a great pick, and for this price range it is the best! On: 2002-12-01
I am considering the Optura 200MC and I was looking for reviews of the camera, and found only two so far on Amazon. So I went to the reviews of the Optura 100MC, the earlier model, and found many more reviews. Most of them were glowingly positive reviews and had many good things to say about the camera. Thats great. What got my attention was a string of reported problems with rewinding the tape. This is a major problem even if it exists in only 30% of the cameras. My problem is that many of the reviews mention what I consider a "deal breaking" problem. The Optura 100MC eats tapes! It may be a great camera, but if it will eat my tapes, (and Murphy says it will only eat the really important tapes, like the birth of my child!), then what good is it? So now my question is this; has anyone experienced the same problem with the Optura 200MC, or has Canon "fixed" the problem? Please let us know by posting a follow up review. Here is a reprint of a review that sums things up on the Optura 100MC: "Caution - Tape Eating Problem, November 3, 2001 Reviewer: John Fallisgaard from Seattle, WA USA I have owned the Optura 100MC for a few weeks now and in general (with one exception) I am pleased with it. However, I suspect there might be a design defect with this camera. I have had two of these now which have had to be returned (I am awaiting my third) due to the tape getting stretched or broken by the mechanism. It happens during a prolonged rewind. Not every time, but all it takes is once and the tape is ruined, particularly on these cameras which have a time code stamp. If the time code is lost, the camera stops and you get a "REMOVE TAPE" warning. Thus as soon as the tape is munged, you cannot rewind past it. I have called Canon on this and they repeatedly have said that I am the only customer who has complained of this problem. That would be fine if not for other bulletin boards where I am starting to hear about the same problem. I have read about 6 other people who have had the same experience, so so much for me being an isolated instance. I think there is a design defect here which canon is not admitting to yet. I would wait to consider this camera until canon comes clean and guarantees they have fixed this problem." On: 2002-11-19
The lens, single-CCD sensor and optical stablization on this camera are of course excellent, as one would expect from Canon. But the 200 MCs predecessor, the Optura 100MC, was a much better value for the steep price tag.For one, the 100MC came with an accessory shoe that made it much easier to attach a pro-level directional mic and light, which fed right off the camera battery and required no cables. Because of the 100MCs very compact size and adaptability, it was arguably more portable, versatile (and certainly cheaper) than the 3-CCD pro-level GL2, the next model up in Canons line. (And despite having only one CCD, the 100MCs picture quality did not differ that significantly from the GL2 either.) Alas, Canon has apparently decided to kill its own competition with the GL2 not by making the GL2 a better camera, but by stripping down the Optura series. With the 200MC revision, theyve taken away the accessory shoe and added consumer features of debatable value, such as a blotchy, preprogrammed "Super Night Mode" and a useless, Windows-only DV messenger functionality. You can still attach accessories, but Canon makes it hard; you have to use an awkward bracket (sold separately) and the accessories must have their own power sources and cables. A fully loaded 200MC is an unwieldly and unpractical tangle. Youre better off with the Optura 100MC, a great little camera that can still be found from used or like-new sellers on Amazon for [price-info] less than the price of a new 200MC. Or, if you can live with a digital (rather than optical) stabilizer, Id recommend you save yourself [price info]and get a brand-new ZR50MC, which still has the accessory shoe that the new Optura has lost. Those are simple but decent cameras, and a bargain considering their price. On: 2002-11-04
He investigado mucho antes de decidir y puedo afirmar que para el usuario común como yo, Canon es la que ofrecer mejor información de sus productos a través de Internet y ello me permite afirmar que la Optura 200 MC es el modelo compacto adecuado para quienes quieran tener una cámara de calidad. Posiblemente haya camáras mas completas, pero siempre mi problema ha sido la molestia de estar cargando un bulto. Este modelo equilibra la alta calidad en un tamaño muy compacto: alta resolución (1.3 MMpixels), Autoflash incorporado, filmación nocturna, exposición automática, estabilizador de imagen y facilidades de multimedia.Es decir que con este equipo cualquier principiante puede parecer un experto y como ocupa poco espacio, a menudo voy a poder llevarla conmigo sin molestias y asà registrar los momentos mas importantes. El precio es algo mayor que otras, pero una cámara de video digital es algo que no se compra con frecuencia sino que esta compra dura muchos años y vale la pena que sea buena.
|
|