Fujifilm A210 3.2 MP Digital Camera w/3x Optical Zoom
By: Fuji Average Rating: 3.5 Total Reviews: 57
More Information
 On: 2007-12-26
I put fresh rechargable batteries into this camera Christmas Eve, then didnt use it. The next day, the red battery light was on when I tried the first photo. Of course, waiting for the camera to green light you for a photo takes at least 7 seconds -- no joke -- which burns battery and wastes many an opportunity. Even at lower resolutions, reload is a huge problem -- downloading the photos to disk to empty the card is no help. I took one photo at Christmas because I didnt bring spare batteries. If you didnt know better, you would think this camera was made at the dawn of digital technology, and you were the caveman that got suckered into buying it.
I rarely get a good photo out of this camera, and I used to enjoy a rep as the reliable family photographer -- no more. The zoom is useless as it moves by gigantic distances and cant be backed up in any smaller increment. It makes a noise like its moving, but I think it has two settings; close and closer -- nothing in between.
There is simply nothing about this camera worth your time. Its so painful to use, you never do and might as well not own a camera. Its also pretty massive and makes you look like a tourist ready to get robbed wherever you take it.
 On: 2007-03-13
I have used my Fugifilm A210 for two years now, here are some observations.
It is a much better camera than my first digital (1.3 MP Olympus).
The 16 MB memory is not enough, but 1 GB memory can be had for $30. I have found that 256MB is plenty.
It does take a while to store pictures and calculate focus and exposure, so I have lost oportunities for good shots because of this, but I have still captured crisp, colorful images.
I recommend you always carry spare batteries, but at least AA batteries are cheap and can be found anywhere.
My A210 has survived trips from the boundary waters (MN) to the summit of Mt. Fuji (Japan).
All that said, today (March 2007) you can find many better cameras for about $100. I just placed an order for a Fujifilm V10 for $125. It promises to provide better performance in a pocket size package.
If you dont mind carrying a bigger camera, my choice would be a Canon Rebel XP. This camera has fine optics and Canons Digic II chip allows rapid fire shooting. For the street price of $575 this is a good value.
On: 2007-02-20
Im not a photographer. I like to take quick snapshots of the kids, animals, etc. This camera couldnt even do that! It takes SO long to start up, and even longer to actually TAKE a picture. When trying to take a picture of a toddler its impossible. It MIGHT be an okay camera is youre using it for inanimate objects, but Im not even sure about that. And dont even try to take a picture in anything but perfect lighting. The pictures are unrecognizable.
My advice... by any other camera than this one. I cant imagine it would be any worse.
 On: 2006-12-28
I recieved this camera as a gift about 2 years ago when i just started getting into photography. Its a very easy to use "snapshot camera" because theres not a whole lot of settings to change yet you still can get quality pictures. With the right lighting and atmosphere you can even create photos that look like they were done by professionals. Time and time again people have been amazed that my photos were taken with such a simple camera. I will try to submit some of my photos on amazon.
I also have dropped this camera at least 5 or 6 times and it still continued to work. One time i dropped it and the lens would not retract but this was only because the lens became unaligned. After popping it straight it worked perfectly. Only when the wind took it and caused it to hit some blacktop did i finally have to have the LCD screen replaced because it cracked.
The video quality is at a small resolution but i had no issues with that, only disappointed because there was no sound on it. I did have some issues with the exposure time because you cannot control it. You can only get long exposure on night shots and even then its only about 3 seconds of exposure. Would have been nice to have more control over that but as i said not expected with a snapshot type camera.
Overall i was really impressed with Fujifilm and would recommend a camera like this for those who take a lot of snapshots. As for those getting into photography, its a nice starter camera but it needs an upgrade to open up how creative you can get with it. I just bought a canon S3 IS so we will see how that works out.
On: 2006-12-27
I recieved this camera as a gift about 2 years ago when i just started getting into photography. Its a very easy to use "snapshot camera" because theres not a whole lot of settings to change yet you still can get quality pictures. With the right lighting and atmosphere you can even create photos that look like they were done by professionals. Time and time again people have been amazed that my photos were taken with such a simple camera. I will try to submit some of my photos on amazon.
I also have dropped this camera at least 5 or 6 times and it still continued to work. One time i dropped it and the lens would not retract but this was only because the lens became unaligned. After popping it straight it worked perfectly. Only when the wind took it and caused it to hit some blacktop did i finally have to have the LCD screen replaced because it cracked.
The video quality is at a small resolution but i had no issues with that, only disappointed because there was no sound on it. I did have some issues with the exposure time because you cannot control it. You can only get long exposure on night shots and even then its only about 3 seconds of exposure. Would have been nice to have more control over that but as i said not expected with a snapshot type camera.
Overall i was really impressed with Fujifilm and would recommend a camera like this for those who take a lot of snapshots. As for those getting into photography, its a nice starter camera but it needs an upgrade to open up how creative you can get with it. I just bought a canon S3 IS so we will see how that works out.
On: 2006-10-03
Ive had this brick of a cam for a couple of years, and I have to say it is the worst, most agravating camera Ive ever used.
Ive missed many "once in a lifetime" shots, and it has just happened again.
As others have said, you install freshly charged batteries, take a couple of shots, and a couple of days later, you miss shots because the batteries are dead.
But even worse, you frantically install new batteries and snap several shots, only to find it hasnt taken a single pic because you didnt set the time and date first!
I wish Id read these reviews before I bought this lemon.
Do yourself a favor and buy something that really works.
On: 2006-10-02
Ive had this brick of a cam for a couple of years, and I have to say it is the worst, most agravating camera Ive ever used.
Ive missed many "once in a lifetime" shots, and it has just happened again.
As others have said, you install freshly charged batteries, take a couple of shots, and a couple of days later, you miss shots because the batteries are dead.
But even worse, you frantically install new batteries and snap several shots, only to find it hasnt taken a single pic because you didnt set the time and date first!
I wish Id read these reviews before I bought this lemon.
Do yourself a favor and buy something that really works.
On: 2006-09-10
This is a really decent starter camera for people entering the world of digital photography. It does not have the confusing menus of a digital SLR. Its a nice point and shoot with a very decent zoom on it.
Though the resolution is low, and prints shouldnt go any bigger than 9x6 or they will be grainy, this is a great little point and shoot to take with you on vacation, to weddings, or other events.
There are a few adjustment menus that help out a lot and sort of give the feel of an SLR because you have this slight control over the exposure value and the white balance.
As a starter camera, I would recommend this. Its not expensive, its well made, its compact, it has a really decent sized memory card (512), and it takes pretty good looking photographs.
I actually used this camera for a photo shoot with a band. This camera took their promo shots, shots for their webpages, and shots for their newly released album.
It is NOT a bad camera, it is a STARTER camera.
On: 2006-09-09
This is a really decent starter camera for people entering the world of digital photography. It does not have the confusing menus of a digital SLR. Its a nice point and shoot with a very decent zoom on it.
Though the resolution is low, and prints shouldnt go any bigger than 9x6 or they will be grainy, this is a great little point and shoot to take with you on vacation, to weddings, or other events.
There are a few adjustment menus that help out a lot and sort of give the feel of an SLR because you have this slight control over the exposure value and the white balance.
As a starter camera, I would recommend this. Its not expensive, its well made, its compact, it has a really decent sized memory card (512), and it takes pretty good looking photographs.
I actually used this camera for a photo shoot with a band. This camera took their promo shots, shots for their webpages, and shots for their newly released album.
It is NOT a bad camera, it is a STARTER camera.
On: 2006-04-29
This was my first digital camera and it served me very well for about two years. At the time I bought it, it was a tremendous deal - 3x optical zoom, 3MP for less than $130 - with macro and movie capability.
About two months ago, it began eating batteries, even when turned off. I notice a number of other people have also had this problem. Now, I can put brand new batteries in it, take 3 or 4 shots, turn it off, and the next day the batteries are dead. When it was new, I could take 10-20 photos, leave the camera for weeks (sometimes months) and then take many more.
On a week-long vacation where I took close to 100 pictures, I used only one set of batteries. Now, a set of batteries usually wont get me through 24 hours, even if I take less than 5 pictures with no flash.
I read about another battery defect in a different Fuji model that was helped by taking out and re-inserting the batteries before putting the camera away but havent had a chance to try it yet.
Bob
 On: 2005-12-22
The manufacturers rating of this camera, at >260 frames per battery set with LCD on, is a complete fraud. I have never managed to get more than 15 frames out a freshly charged high-capacity new battery set and I had this camera exhaust the set in just 3 frames. The zoom jumps discontinuously, often preventing one from using an optimal setting.
On: 2005-12-21
The manufacturers rating of this camera, at >260 frames per battery set with LCD on, is a complete fraud. I have never managed to get more than 15 frames out a freshly charged high-capacity new battery set and I had this camera exhaust the set in just 3 frames. The zoom jumps discontinuously, often preventing one from using an optimal setting.
On: 2005-12-07
I bought this camera because I was on a tight budget and thought I was getting a good value for the price. For a few dollars more I could have found a digital camera I would enjoy much more. What I can say in favor of this camera is it works and could be a good starter for a child or teenager. Heres why I strongly recommend NOT choosing this camera:
*Its bulky. Dont bother trying to fit it in your pocket.
*Its poorly contructed. The plastic exterior scratches easily and the coating rubs off after only a few months of use.
*Not user friendly. Its difficult to change options and preferences. Preferences (such as date and time) have to be programed frequently. You cannot take pictures without doing this (each time you turn on the camera).
*Poor flash. The flash is too bright and makes everyone look really pale and washed out- Photoshop can do little to correct this. Removing the flash usually means total blur and/or darkness.
*Unreasonably long delay. Enough said.
On: 2005-08-07
After almost a year and a half, this camera has simply quit working correctly. When I turned it on, it either wouldnt focus at all, making the pictures extremely blurry, or wouldnt let me take pictures. At first, it would only do that sometimes, but it continually got worse, and now it wont work at all. Even while this camera did work, it was very slow at taking pictures, and even after the picture was taken, it took at least 15 seconds to take another picture. It is very bulky, and hard to carry around with you. All in all, i do not recommend this camera for anyone.
On: 2005-06-30
The A210 worked okay for a year, then as I was taking pictures at my sons 2nd b-day party, the camera began making horizontal bright-white lines across the photos (like looking through venetian blinds). I called Fuji tech support...they said its been a common problem w/ the FinePix models, but because I was passed the 1-year warranty they would not replace it. I mailed it to Fuji (at my expense - also had pay for insurance) for a repair estimate and they wanted more to fix it than the camera was worth. I will definitely not be replacing this camera w/ another Fuji. Besides the above problem, the time between shots was painfully long. By the time the camera was ready to take another picture, the moment-trying-to-be-captured would be long gone. Buy lots of AA batteries for this camera....youll need them! I was lucky to get 2 events out of a set of batteries. In talking w/ photographer buffs, Canon seems to be the brand of choice. Hope this helps.
On: 2005-06-07
Im 15 years old and I got this camera a little over a year ago. This was my first digital camera that I had and its very easy to understand. Now Im ready for a new camera because the size of the camera is inconvienient and the pause in between pictures/start-up time is very slow. I like to use my camera to be able to capture a moment right away and by the time my camera turns on and is ready to take a picture, its too late. The quality of the pictures are good except randomly a few pictures will be blurry(even if i wasnt moving the camera around). The flash doesnt reach very far but if the objects close then it works well. If you do get this camera I would recommend buying a battery charger and rechargable batteries. The batteries are more expensive but last a lot longer than normal batteries. The nice thing about having a camera that took AAb batteries was if my batteries would die it was easy to find AAs instead of having to carry around a charger.
Overall I would say this is a good product, but not good for long term.
On: 2005-05-24
I was given the Fujifilm 2400 as a baby shower gift in 2001. I knew that my beloved Nikon FM was just too slow to keep up with all the baby pictures I wanted to take. The colors & definition was awesome. But the MPs werent there for great enlargements. So when my husband suggested I upgrade & he use my 2400 I went for it. I liked the Fujifilm enough to go with another one. I got the A210 and was disappointed. The colors & definition just arent there. Ive had it over a year & have yet to have a photo that I want to enlarge more than a 5x7. I find myself using the older 2400 when its nearby. I do still carry the A210 in my purse all the time & use it very often. But I keep window-shopping for an upgrade. Another Fujifilm?? Im not sure. Ill keep reading the reviews.
On: 2005-05-23
I was given the Fujifilm 2400 as a baby shower gift in 2001. I knew that my beloved Nikon FM was just too slow to keep up with all the baby pictures I wanted to take. The colors & definition was awesome. But the MPs werent there for great enlargements. So when my husband suggested I upgrade & he use my 2400 I went for it. I liked the Fujifilm enough to go with another one. I got the A210 and was disappointed. The colors & definition just arent there. Ive had it over a year & have yet to have a photo that I want to enlarge more than a 5x7. I find myself using the older 2400 when its nearby. I do still carry the A210 in my purse all the time & use it very often. But I keep window-shopping for an upgrade. Another Fujifilm?? Im not sure. Ill keep reading the reviews.
On: 2005-05-08
I initially bought an EXTREMELY cheap digital from Wal-Mart for $20 (i know, it was stupid), so I saw this at Best Buy for $125, which seemed like a very good deal for a camera with 3.2 Megapixels.
Well, i still kind of stand by that, its hard to beat that price for so many MPs, but that doesnt really mean you should buy it.
this camera does not come with a charger or rechargeable batteries. I knew this when i bought it, but didnt think it would be to bad....wrong, it takes 2AA at a time, and with normal use (an hour or so every couple of days) it goes through about 4 or 6 a WEEK! if you like taking photos all the time, but cant afford a pro camera, dont buy this, the flash is decent (although it takes a while between taking pictues) but when it is off, it is TERRIBLE in even the slightest darkness.
I recently upgraded to an Olympus Stylus 410 4.0 Megapixels, and am SOOOO much happier with it, it comes with a charger!!!
the "cradle"....dont start thinking that this is any sort of dock or something, its more of a "stand" really, its a cheap plastic square to set the camera in/on, and doesnt really serve any use.
if you need a cheap camera, decent pictures, and rarely take pictures, get this, for everyone else, dont bother.0
On: 2005-05-07
I initially bought an EXTREMELY cheap digital from Wal-Mart for $20 (i know, it was stupid), so I saw this at Best Buy for $125, which seemed like a very good deal for a camera with 3.2 Megapixels.
Well, i still kind of stand by that, its hard to beat that price for so many MPs, but that doesnt really mean you should buy it.
this camera does not come with a charger or rechargeable batteries. I knew this when i bought it, but didnt think it would be to bad....wrong, it takes 2AA at a time, and with normal use (an hour or so every couple of days) it goes through about 4 or 6 a WEEK! if you like taking photos all the time, but cant afford a pro camera, dont buy this, the flash is decent (although it takes a while between taking pictues) but when it is off, it is TERRIBLE in even the slightest darkness.
I recently upgraded to an Olympus Stylus 410 4.0 Megapixels, and am SOOOO much happier with it, it comes with a charger!!!
the "cradle"....dont start thinking that this is any sort of dock or something, its more of a "stand" really, its a cheap plastic square to set the camera in/on, and doesnt really serve any use.
if you need a cheap camera, decent pictures, and rarely take pictures, get this, for everyone else, dont bother.0
 On: 2005-02-19
This camera takes great pictures for a cheaper digital camera. I sell items on ebay and my pictures come out great. Check out my pictures on ebay. My user name is monte.ss My last camera was an Olympus and it left white spots on a lot of my pictures. This one does not and takes very good pictures even close up. It is also very easy to use and understand. The video movies are good but I wish they had sound with them. The battery life is very good and this camera only takes two standard size AA batteries compared two the four my Olympus took. The camera seems very durable as well and I do not get concerned when my family (younger kids) uses it for fear of them damaging it. I am very happy with this camera.
On: 2004-10-04
This is pretty good ya know it is really it is
On: 2004-10-03
This is pretty good ya know it is really it is
On: 2004-08-06
This thing is a steal!!!! Easy to use, great pictures, great software, small and light. The only problem that I have with this camera is that i had to buy a rechargable batteries. Also be sure to pick up the cradle.
On: 2004-08-05
This thing is a steal!!!! Easy to use, great pictures, great software, small and light. The only problem that I have with this camera is that i had to buy a rechargable batteries. Also be sure to pick up the cradle.
On: 2004-07-31
This is my first digital camera. Friends of mine who know about digital cameras said I should find one with at least 3 MP and 3X Optical zoom (cameras that only have digital zoom lose quality when they zoom in). This was the best deal I could find with those features. The camera is easy to use even though Ive never really messed with digital cameras before.
On: 2004-07-30
This is my first digital camera. Friends of mine who know about digital cameras said I should find one with at least 3 MP and 3X Optical zoom (cameras that only have digital zoom lose quality when they zoom in). This was the best deal I could find with those features. The camera is easy to use even though Ive never really messed with digital cameras before.
On: 2004-07-25
This is a very user-friendly camera. Its fairly light and nice looking.
It has quite a lot of different functions that should satisfy all beginners.
The picture quality seems good, clear, and sharp, and the software is easy to operate.
For macintosh users like me, there is no software needed actually.
On: 2004-07-16
This is one great camera. My sister who is a professional photograher oftens borrows my Fugifilm because of the ease of use, great quality of pictures and it is compact. I am really impressed that I can finally take a decent picture and now have many of them as my wall paper on my computer.
On: 2004-07-15
I am so pleased with this camera, and I love the program. The only thing I wish it had voice when you are recording movies. The program is easy and I know where my pictures are. I had Kodak easy share, and I spend hours locating my pictures. I am still learning how to operate it, but I am happy with it, so I had to let you know.
by: Anonymous On: 2004-07-10
This is one awesome camera.. (I now have 2) I dont scan documents I use the camera and its macro setting. (also with a stand so there is no movement. Some people might say it is FAT;
I say it is HUSKEY and with the great pics it takes, who cares that you cant drop it in a shirt pocket.. When in Review mode, it is great to be able to magnify so you can check expressions
and make sure all eyes are open. Fuji did it again( I also have the 602 and for ease of use I take one of my A210 and leave the
602 at home unless I have some real serious work to do...
On: 2004-07-09
This is one awesome camera.. (I now have 2) I dont scan documents I use the camera and its macro setting. (also with a stand so there is no movement. Some people might say it is FAT;
I say it is HUSKEY and with the great pics it takes, who cares that you cant drop it in a shirt pocket.. When in Review mode, it is great to be able to magnify so you can check expressions
and make sure all eyes are open. Fuji did it again( I also have the 602 and for ease of use I take one of my A210 and leave the
602 at home unless I have some real serious work to do...
by: Anonymous On: 2004-07-03
I have 2 of these and talked a friend into getting one. Gave her about 20 minutes of instruction. MB then went on safari to Africa and came back with about 170 pictures. She had some photos of Victoria Falls that I would have been proud to have taken. Planning to give a class to a Senior Group and guess what--
This will be the camera that I will demonstrate. With what you save on the camera, you can invest in more memory
On: 2004-06-30
I bought this camera while on a budget and in need of a quick camera. I bought it for one trip and it worked so well I now use it every chance I get. I have gotten quality 5x7s and for transmiting over the internet there is no loss in resolution, I was completely surprised. I was seriously considering an HP model at the same time, thats when size became a factor, it is convenient to carry and was easily put in my pocket when visiting an Amusement park. The only downfall is the size of the XD cards, I misplaced my spare the first week, fortunately It was at home and in my compter area so after shifting some CD rom it was found. I would definately by another or similar Camera in the future.
On: 2004-06-29
I bought this camera while on a budget and in need of a quick camera. I bought it for one trip and it worked so well I now use it every chance I get. I have gotten quality 5x7s and for transmiting over the internet there is no loss in resolution, I was completely surprised. I was seriously considering an HP model at the same time, thats when size became a factor, it is convenient to carry and was easily put in my pocket when visiting an Amusement park. The only downfall is the size of the XD cards, I misplaced my spare the first week, fortunately It was at home and in my compter area so after shifting some CD rom it was found. I would definately by another or similar Camera in the future.
On: 2004-06-23
Same as most reviewers on this camera, my first one and I love it! Ive had it close to two weeks now and am finding myself addicted to taking pictures just because I know I dont have to worry about buying another roll of film. I havent upgraded from the 16mb card, but that hasnt been a problem since I download my pictures onto my computer everyday. I already had rechargeable batteries and they come in use now more than ever (I used them pretty much just for my cd player). Like another poster stated, the alkaline batteries it came with died soon after playing around with the camera trying to figure things out - approximately 19 pictures at 3.2mp, not to mention checking out the menu on the LCD screen. Defintely happy with the purchase.
On: 2004-06-17
Great deal for the money. Other users are right about buying a charger with rechargeable batteries, and a larger memory card. It comes with 2 alkaline batteries, they wont last long, especially if you play around with it like I did. I just got mine a few days ago. I noticed leaving the display off helps to save on batteries a little though. I love mine, I would recomend buying the power adapter for the camera too for when you download the pictures onto youre computer, I think thats also where the camera uses a extra battery power too. I just ordered a 128MB picture card and a charger with 4 batteries for mine.
On: 2004-06-16
Great deal for the money. Other users are right about buying a charger with rechargeable batteries, and a larger memory card. It comes with 2 alkaline batteries, they wont last long, especially if you play around with it like I did. I just got mine a few days ago. I noticed leaving the display off helps to save on batteries a little though. I love mine, I would recomend buying the power adapter for the camera too for when you download the pictures onto youre computer, I think thats also where the camera uses a extra battery power too. I just ordered a 128MB picture card and a charger with 4 batteries for mine.
On: 2004-06-09
I love this camera. After being a great fan of 35mm, I changed my mind. I just sent some pictures to be made from the JPEGs and they came back beautifully. You could not even tell they are digital! The only reason I gave it 4 instead of five stars is because the only criticism I have is the flash. The flash does not carry very well in low light situations.
by: Anonymous On: 2004-06-08
Great camera all around. Have had it for 1 week and sofar have taken over 1,000 pictures. The photo prints turn out better then regular cameras (35mm/throw away) and the best part is, you dont have to worry about pictures you dont want, like of your thumb.....
On: 2004-06-06
Good and fine prints and fantastic picture quality for a starter.
by: Anonymous On: 2004-06-05
this camera takes excellent outdoor pictures. indoors it seems to have a problem adjusting the light correctly...on close up shots indoors(e.g., taking pictures of stuff to sell on ebay) the flash overpowers the picture. but, overall, for the money i think its a good deal.
On: 2004-06-04
this camera takes excellent outdoor pictures. indoors it seems to have a problem adjusting the light correctly...on close up shots indoors(e.g., taking pictures of stuff to sell on ebay) the flash overpowers the picture. but, overall, for the money i think its a good deal.
by: Anonymous On: 2004-06-03
Yeah, if youre a professional photographer, this is not the way to go. However, if you want to take beautiful, vivid, detailed pics, this camera is for you. I sell bearded dragons and chameleons on the internet, and needed something that would show the colors, markings, and detail needed to make that side business successful. I was using the Oregon Scientific camera that is the size of three credit cards stacked on top of one another, and i could not get a close up shot to catch the detail I needed (however that camera is perfect for my OTHER side job, being a spy!LOL) Anyway, dont listen to others when they say it is not user friendly, they are just seriously mentally challenged. IT IS VERY USER FRIENDLY! One drawback is indeed the battery life. DO NOT use regular AA batteries. Use the NiMH rechargeables, spend a little extra for the cradle that is like $15, and you will never need to worry about the battery life. They recharge completely from being fully dead in an hour. Great little camera.
On: 2004-06-02
Yeah, if youre a professional photographer, this is not the way to go. However, if you want to take beautiful, vivid, detailed pics, this camera is for you. I sell bearded dragons and chameleons on the internet, and needed something that would show the colors, markings, and detail needed to make that side business successful. I was using the Oregon Scientific camera that is the size of three credit cards stacked on top of one another, and i could not get a close up shot to catch the detail I needed (however that camera is perfect for my OTHER side job, being a spy!LOL) Anyway, dont listen to others when they say it is not user friendly, they are just seriously mentally challenged. IT IS VERY USER FRIENDLY! One drawback is indeed the battery life. DO NOT use regular AA batteries. Use the NiMH rechargeables, spend a little extra for the cradle that is like $15, and you will never need to worry about the battery life. They recharge completely from being fully dead in an hour. Great little camera.
On: 2004-05-24
I have had my camera for about a month now and am very happy with it. I had been using an older Sony Mavica and had issues with it. So far this has been well worth the price I paid. I was very happy with all the photos the card held verses a floppy disk.
On: 2004-05-23
I have had this camera since October 2003 and Im very satisfied with it. Its my first digital camera and got it for a great price (considering its features). It is compact and it doesnt consume a lot of power. The image quality is good. Im no professional photographer, so I mostly e-mail my pics or take the card to somplace and have the pics printed. Theres no escape: you have to read the manual & get to know the camera . The controls are handy and you can say that it is a point-and-shoot product. Outdoor pictures with plenty of light are excellent. Cant say the same about night shots. They tend to come out dark and blurry (at least with the auto mode on). Bottomline: This camera is a great choice for non-professionals and starters.
On: 2004-05-22
I recently got this camera from amazon and with just 130$ for 3.2Megapixel it was a steal rather than a deal(also read 3.2 optical zoom along with 3x digital zoom)
when i was buying it i was tentative for the price it was been offered but i must admit i was wrong and all of my friends have liked it and one even thinking to sell his other digital camera and get this one.
this is the simplest camera to operate and is highly recommended for those who just want to use it for family purpose
Great job done by Fujifilm and thanks amazon.
On: 2004-05-22
I have had this camera since October 2003 and Im very satisfied with it. Its my first digital camera and got it for a great price (considering its features). It is compact and it doesnt consume a lot of power. The image quality is good. Im no professional photographer, so I mostly e-mail my pics or take the card to somplace and have the pics printed. Theres no escape: you have to read the manual & get to know the camera . The controls are handy and you can say that it is a point-and-shoot product. Outdoor pictures with plenty of light are excellent. Cant say the same about night shots. They tend to come out dark and blurry (at least with the auto mode on). Bottomline: This camera is a great choice for non-professionals and starters.
On: 2004-05-22
At the current sale price of $129, this camera costs about the same as an equivalent film point and shoot camera. If you are looking for a digital camera for everyday snapshots, this is the BEST DEAL available. If you are looking for a digital camera with professional quality pictures,this is not for you. This camera takes two AA batteries and is good for around 20 pictures. If you dont have one, get a battery charger with four rechargeable batteries.
by: Anonymous On: 2004-05-19
The price is the best part about this camera. I played with it for about two weeks and did not have a good deal of luck. Pictures outside in bright light were good. But any pictures indoors with light and flash were not as good as my other digital camera. Lot of blurry pictures. Flash would completely blackout the rest of the picture. LCD display not very crisp to check for blurriness of snapped pictures. Easy to use, just very slow in saving pictures, erasing pictures and shutter speed. I dont know how good a deal it is when the pictures dont come out well.
On: 2004-05-13
Ive used a pretty wide range of digital cameras so I feel comfortable grading the Finepix 210 a solid 3, possibly a 3.5. I bypassed inexpensive 2MP cameras to make the jump to this, one of the least expensive 3MP ones around that had decent reviews.
After using it I can say that it is definitely lacking the sharpness of competitors like the Nikon Coolpix 3100. I only use it at the highest quality level and even closeups for portraits are obviously not razor sharp like Ive become accustomed to with the 3MP Nikon and Sony products.
On the other hand this camera is at least $50-$70 less than the competitors and when accessories are factored in I was able to get the camera, a 128MB xd card and the handy USB cradle (with rechargeable battery) for $100 less than I couldve with Nikon or Sony.
The bottom line: this is a decent camera that puts 3MP in reach of the average casual user but it is not very sharp.
On: 2004-05-12
THIS IS MY FIRST DIGITAL CAMERA PURCHASE BECAUSE I WAS WAITING FOR THEM TO COME DOWN IN PRICE. I AM GLAD I DID AND HAPPY I CHOSE THIS FUJI. EASY TO USE AND GREAT PICTURES! WHAT MORE CAN I SAY?
On: 2004-05-12
Ive used a pretty wide range of digital cameras so I feel comfortable grading the Finepix 210 a solid 3, possibly a 3.5. I bypassed inexpensive 2MP cameras to make the jump to this, one of the least expensive 3MP ones around that had decent reviews.
After using it I can say that it is definitely lacking the sharpness of competitors like the Nikon Coolpix 3100. I only use it at the highest quality level and even closeups for portraits are obviously not razor sharp like Ive become accustomed to with the 3MP Nikon and Sony products.
On the other hand this camera is at least $50-$70 less than the competitors and when accessories are factored in I was able to get the camera, a 128MB xd card and the handy USB cradle (with rechargeable battery) for $100 less than I couldve with Nikon or Sony.
The bottom line: this is a decent camera that puts 3MP in reach of the average casual user but it is not very sharp.
On: 2004-05-11
THIS IS MY FIRST DIGITAL CAMERA PURCHASE BECAUSE I WAS WAITING FOR THEM TO COME DOWN IN PRICE. I AM GLAD I DID AND HAPPY I CHOSE THIS FUJI. EASY TO USE AND GREAT PICTURES! WHAT MORE CAN I SAY?
On: 2004-04-04
This camera takes great pictures for the price. Its also fairly easy to use. A couple major drawbacks: 1.The length of time for the camera to reset for the next picture is extremely long (up to 10 seconds). 2.The camera goes through batteries very quickly.
I must emphasize the great picture quality produced by the A210. Compared to other brands in the same price range; youll get better prints from the A210.
On: 2004-03-19
We got this camera and the extra card for our trip to Hawaii.
Didnt know what to expect, pictures turned out great! We loved
the movie mode too. The only exception that it does eat up alot
of batteries. Next purchase we make is the rechargables.
Glad we got this, its a great purchase for the buck.
On: 2004-02-23
Wow, I have to say that I was a bit skeptical when I first bought this camera for only 140 bucks. I was thinking it must have something wrong with it! When it arrived and I opened it, I was proven wrong! I loved it immediately. I loved the sleek design, and the ease of use. Whats better is that you can choose if you want to take pics in 1mp 2 mp or 3, as to save room on the memory card I guess. I also like that once you take a pic you can edit it right with the camera , right after you take it. You can zoom in with the camera , then crop the picture as well. I figure that the price is one of the best things as well. It is 3mp and you would think it would be at least 200 bucks, but at 140 I think its an unbelivable deal.
Now I know nothing is perfect, this is so close, so now your looking for a con, the only one I see is the feel of it, the camera does have a little cheap feel to the plastic. But come on, I only paid 140 bucks. This is the perfect camera for the middle class family, besides who needs all the bells and whistles that one would never use!
On: 2004-02-22
Wow, I have to say that I was a bit skeptical when I first bought this camera for only 140 bucks. I was thinking it must have something wrong with it! When it arrived and I opened it, I was proven wrong! I loved it immediately. I loved the sleek design, and the ease of use. Whats better is that you can choose if you want to take pics in 1mp 2 mp or 3, as to save room on the memory card I guess. I also like that once you take a pic you can edit it right with the camera , right after you take it. You can zoom in with the camera , then crop the picture as well. I figure that the price is one of the best things as well. It is 3mp and you would think it would be at least 200 bucks, but at 140 I think its an unbelivable deal.
Now I know nothing is perfect, this is so close, so now your looking for a con, the only one I see is the feel of it, the camera does have a little cheap feel to the plastic. But come on, I only paid 140 bucks. This is the perfect camera for the middle class family, besides who needs all the bells and whistles that one would never use!
On: 2004-02-19
Ive just purchased the Fuji A210 for my daughter and found it to be a very good camera. The photographs came out rich and in living color. The camera is easy and user friendly. Not a bad camera for those of you just starting out into the digital photography world. Are there better cameras? Yes there are. But at the price you pay for the A210 this is a decent camera at a fair price.
On: 2004-02-18
Ive just purchased the Fuji A210 for my daughter and found it to be a very good camera. The photographs came out rich and in living color. The camera is easy and user friendly. Not a bad camera for those of you just starting out into the digital photography world. Are there better cameras? Yes there are. But at the price you pay for the A210 this is a decent camera at a fair price.
On: 2004-02-17
The pictures that come from this camera, are grainy and unpredictable. Sometimes, it takes 2 or 3 shots to capture one picture because for whatever reason, the picture will be blurred - even at the highest setting with great lighting. I have been using digital cameras for the past few years and this one is the worst Ive ever seen. I bought it for the extra memory card, and cradle but the camera isnt worth it. While the software and camera is easy to use, I find it more frustrating to take a quality picture. I frequently find myself reaching for my old trusty Olympus to ensure that I get the shot right. If I had to do it over again, Id spend another $150 and buy another Olympus. This camera is more frustrating than its worth!
On: 2004-01-31
I have owned several digital cameras and bought this as a low-end bang around every day use camera. Takes great pictures and is easy to use. Battery use is not really that bad, although I do recommend getting rechargeables. The case design is not all it could be....is a little blocky
On: 2004-01-30
I have owned several digital cameras and bought this as a low-end bang around every day use camera. Takes great pictures and is easy to use. Battery use is not really that bad, although I do recommend getting rechargeables. The case design is not all it could be....is a little blocky
On: 2004-01-24
For those of you who reviewed this camera, stating how easy it is to use "your first digital camera"... well, the fact is, this camera is nothing special at all.
The reluctance of the zoom to zoom (try it!), the shutter delay after pushing the shutter button, the SERIOUSLY long time it takes to set itself up for another photo after taking one, and of couse, the major battery-eating problems lead me to be totally underwhelmed by this camera. Sure, its got decent features... but ALL decent digital cameras do the same exact things. And BETTER.
Im bringing mine back - dont waste your time.
On: 2004-01-23
For those of you who reviewed this camera, stating how easy it is to use "your first digital camera"... well, the fact is, this camera is nothing special at all.
The reluctance of the zoom to zoom (try it!), the shutter delay after pushing the shutter button, the SERIOUSLY long time it takes to set itself up for another photo after taking one, and of couse, the major battery-eating problems lead me to be totally underwhelmed by this camera. Sure, its got decent features... but ALL decent digital cameras do the same exact things. And BETTER.
Im bringing mine back - dont waste your time.
by: Anonymous On: 2003-12-29
as I have never owned a digital camera before. But I must say Im quite impressed. I took several shots, thinking they were on the 3MP setting, and they looked great even when fully blown up on a 19 inch monitor. It turned out that they were only on the 1 MP setting, and the 3 MP were of course even nicer!It was definitely bulkier than the other models I browsed. But since Im coming from a traditional 35 mm, it actually seems lighter and smaller than Im used to. And so far, battery life seems decent, although I dont have a great feel for that yet.
On: 2003-12-28
as I have never owned a digital camera before. But I must say Im quite impressed. I took several shots, thinking they were on the 3MP setting, and they looked great even when fully blown up on a 19 inch monitor. It turned out that they were only on the 1 MP setting, and the 3 MP were of course even nicer!It was definitely bulkier than the other models I browsed. But since Im coming from a traditional 35 mm, it actually seems lighter and smaller than Im used to. And so far, battery life seems decent, although I dont have a great feel for that yet.
On: 2003-12-27
The Fujifilm FinePix A210 digital camera is a great buy. You cant get a better camera for under $200. I just got one for Christmas and I had it working in under a minute. Very user friendly. Easy to use and figure out. Great looking pictures and movies. You may want to buy a larger memory card though, if you plan on using the movies often. Great all-around camera!!!
On: 2003-12-26
The Fujifilm FinePix A210 digital camera is a great buy. You cant get a better camera for under $200. I just got one for Christmas and I had it working in under a minute. Very user friendly. Easy to use and figure out. Great looking pictures and movies. You may want to buy a larger memory card though, if you plan on using the movies often. Great all-around camera!!!
On: 2003-12-26
I love this camera! Its good on batteries, focuses nicely (thank goodness for 3 mps and above!), is super easy to use, and came with a nice size memory card. I would definately recommend this!
On: 2003-12-18
Very basic review: I have shot 35mm since 1978. This camera is my first experience in the world of digital photography. Ive only had it a week or so, but I am *very* impressed with its versatility - allowing full auto mode or my choice in manual set up. Picture quality is so much better than expected. Im enjoying very much working with my photos at home instead of picking them up "developed" at the local drugstore. Highly recommended.
On: 2003-12-05
I just bought this camera and I think its a tremendous value for the price. Its compact enough to carry around and the pictures it takes are great. I read some of the reviews about the batteries but I didnt have that problem at all. I took at least 75 shots and still have the same batteries in it. A real great value.
On: 2003-12-04
I just bought this camera and I think its a tremendous value for the price. Its compact enough to carry around and the pictures it takes are great. I read some of the reviews about the batteries but I didnt have that problem at all. I took at least 75 shots and still have the same batteries in it. A real great value.
by: gadgester On: 2003-11-28
This camera is great as a starter digital camera, especially for people who are usually afraid of photography. The camera body is easy to hold and the buttons are laid out user-friendlily. Its the usual snap-and-go type, and anyone who half a brain can use the basic functions after picking it up. The memory cards have come down *a lot* in price so theres no reason to whine any more. BTW, speaking of price, the A210 can be had for under one-fifty if you shop around. For that price this is simply the best 3MP camera.Image quality is excellent outdoors when light is aplenty. Night shots do tend to be dark and noisy (noise refers to the coarse-grained color dots you see in a poorly exposed picture). But after you read the manual you can do things to improve night shots. Besides, no camera takes great picures when theres insufficient light.
On: 2003-11-10
Ive been on the search for a decent DigCamera, and this has reached my expectations in every level. I see some complaints about the LCD getting grainy. #1. Yes its not that great of an LCD, but what would you want a better LCD than picture quality? I think not, its all about the Picture Quality, this thing can hit up to a 2048xWhatever, And still its better than a 35MM picture, All In All I took pictures in pitch black from about 30 ft away, and my pictures turned out better than you think. Get this camera while you can. And yes ive taken over 200+ pics with the standard batteries, that came with the camera, and yes the LCD was on. No batterys dead yet.
On: 2003-11-09
I like this camera because:a) Its batteries last for more than just a few pics (so far the first set has taken more than 15 pics). b) Its comfortable to use (nice size and shape) and nice looking. c) It takes great pics. Color is rich and image is realistic. d) It connects easily via USB and the software is simple if a bit more than what i need. e) You can connect it directly to your video viewer (TV, another cam, or VCR) with the included video cable. I dont like that: a) The power switch slides instead of clicking off and on (could leave it on by mistake since its position is always the same). b) You have to switch it to another mode to view pics easily (you CAN see them in the main view, but its a pain). Excellent buy at $200!
On: 2003-11-08
I like this camera because:a) Its batteries last for more than just a few pics (so far the first set has taken more than 15 pics). b) Its comfortable to use (nice size and shape) and nice looking. c) It takes great pics. Color is rich and image is realistic. d) It connects easily via USB and the software is simple if a bit more than what i need. e) You can connect it directly to your video viewer (TV, another cam, or VCR) with the included video cable. I dont like that: a) The power switch slides instead of clicking off and on (could leave it on by mistake since its position is always the same). b) You have to switch it to another mode to view pics easily (you CAN see them in the main view, but its a pain). Excellent buy at $200!
On: 2003-11-02
When I was looking for a digital camera to take to Europe, a friend warned me to buy one that could take standard batteries, because I wouldnt be able to re-charge one that has an installed lithium ion battery. So my main reason for getting the Finepix was because it takes AA batteries. What a mistake. This camera goes thru batteries like you would not BELIEVE. I mean I can put in a fresh new set of AAs and within 5 shots, I am getting the low battery light. Take 2 more shots and the camera shuts itself down. It also takes terrible nighttime photos, you cannot see thru the viewfinder, and once you take the shot its very washed out. What a waste of $299.
On: 2003-11-01
When I was looking for a digital camera to take to Europe, a friend warned me to buy one that could take standard batteries, because I wouldnt be able to re-charge one that has an installed lithium ion battery. So my main reason for getting the Finepix was because it takes AA batteries. What a mistake. This camera goes thru batteries like you would not BELIEVE. I mean I can put in a fresh new set of AAs and within 5 shots, I am getting the low battery light. Take 2 more shots and the camera shuts itself down. It also takes terrible nighttime photos, you cannot see thru the viewfinder, and once you take the shot its very washed out. What a waste of $299.
by: Anonymous On: 2003-10-14
A lot of camera for the price. Excellent feel and easy to use. Setup was easy. I was taking pictures and printing in less than 15 minutes. Entry level price with more than entry level features.
by: Anonymous On: 2003-09-24
I have had for three weeks since my Fuji 2650 was dropped in my local lake....The moral is to make sure you keep the camera on a neck starp when not in use. This new model has better battery life and quicker start up than my Fuji 2650. The shutter lag is not as long and the color balace on indoor flash shots has less red eye. A definate lot of camera for the money. I did get the optional docking cradle that comes with rechareable batteries and also make loading pictures into your PC a snap.
On: 2003-08-28
Fuji 2600 sold very good in 2001 because it was cheap & solid camera (with below average build quality). They removed some features and downgraded its screen & lens speed to make 2650 in 2002 even cheaper. Come 2003 they have added video-out/3MP and futher downgraded it, made it uglier and zero innovation.Basically its gotten thicker (well above 2 inches), poor night capability, grainy LCD, cheapo plastic body, expensive xD cards and average build quality. The picture quality in daylight is very good though. Battery life and user interface are also good. Meanwhile cameras from Canon, Sony, Nikon and other companies have improved a lot, added many features and have gotten cheaper. Right now Canon A60/A70 is much better option. Ofcourse first time users (who never had a digital camera before) will give it 5 stars and will be very happy.
|
|
