DC DXG-301V Digital Video Recorder with MPEG4 & Digital Still Capability
By: DXG Average Rating: 3.0 Total Reviews: 22
More Information
 On: 2008-02-12
This camera is cheap quality and doesnt produce good results. Invest in a real camera. Dont buy this one.
On: 2007-12-27
The camera itself wasnt all that bad. The video quality was okay, the picture quality was fine. But it was the sound quality of the video that really threw me off. I got this as a Christmas present and loved it... Until I tried playing the video back. In a nutshell, it is nearly impossible to hear anything anyone is saying if theyre further than 10 or less feet away, even when you download the video to the computer. So I thought to myself, why not just buy a microphone for it? Wrongo! I found out the hard way that it isnt possible to use a microphone with the camcorder.
So, if you just want a camera to make music videos or other silent productions, I guess this is fine for that. But if youre looking for a decent quality video camera for school or home videos or short productions, I would CERTAINLY not reccomend this.
On: 2007-01-11
This one is a product of bad quality, the cap of the batteries to a few days I damage enough of light is needed in order that the sign meets slightly clear, product of bad quality I do not recommend it to him(you,them) and for quality the price must be low
 On: 2007-01-07
When I purchased this item, I was expecting a video recorder that can also take still photographs. Instead it is a still camera with video recording capabilities. The product name is misleading.
That does not mean that is a bad camera. In fact it is a great camera, if the user intends to use it primarily for still photographs. For video recording I would recommend something else. The resolution is only 640x480 and the results are heavily pixelated videos. The device also produces horrible monophonic sound recording.
 On: 2007-01-03
does a decent job especially for the price I like the sd card I have a reader on my PC and just plug them in not a 500 dollar unit but I have filmed our racecar with it and burned it to a cd and it looks about like tv good enough for a memory booster
On: 2006-12-10
Well at least, some stuff is cool, free cam bag, the pics come out excellent. The video feature is really crappy and when you play back video its very choppy and the audio is a little hard to know whats being heard. Also you could through dozens of batteries with this cam. The adapter doesnt help only if youre going to sit down and review whats on it or keep the power from draining. The sd card kept popping out for someone which caused the cam to "freeze up".
Bottom line...I recommend at least researching other brands of mini-tapeless cams...but this one...isnt worth 159 or whatever. Its trash. Go for something else.
On: 2006-08-26
Ive been using a Sony Cybershot 2.1 Megapixel for the past few years and except for the BATTERY DRAIN Ive been very pleased with it as I am only interested in my camera for snap shots. I bought my DXG-301 (New) off ebay for $76 delivered and they even threw in a 128 MB SD Card! FIRST of all, I read the owners manual (many dont seem to) and then spent an hour "playing" with the Still picture functions (not interested in video). What was I looking for in a digital camera?
A CCD rather than a CMOS sensor, the sensitivity of the CCD (ISO 100-400) does much better than the CMOS with normal indoor lighting WITHOUT the flash (battery drain!). The DXG-301 meets these requirements.
A minimum of 3 megapixel (recommended) resolution in case I ever wish to print out any of my pictures (rare). The DXG meets that requirement.
An optical zoom of at least 6X. Not with the DXG301V, it only has a 4X digial zoom, nothing is perfect I guess.
LONG battery life! The DXG301 comes through with flying colors. Using rechargeable batteries I played with the camera for over an hour with and without the flash. Their was little battery drain and it only took about 4-5 seconds to recharge the flash. OUTSTANDING!
Software. Looked OK but Ill use the photo editor I already have on my PC.
Small, handy size, With my bifocals I had some difficulty reading the control button labels but the LCD Screen gave no problems. I think its just a question of my becoming more familiar with the contols.
The manual ajustments for the various settings are a major plus. Ill "perfect" my settings in due course after additional experience.
In short Im VERY pleased with the DXG301 as a STILL picture camera. Does it rival a $500 mini camera? Nope but the DXG301V will go places I wouldnt risk an expensive camera. It will "get the job done" for me. The video part is an "extra" I probably wont use unless I see a flying saucer. Id gladly pay $100+ for this camera .
On: 2006-08-13
I recieved this camera as a Christmas gift about two years ago. I had asked for a digital camera, but did not expect to get a video camera.
I feel like the device should not be marketed as a video camera, but more as a still camera because the quality of the videos is quite poor. My interest in photography has recently grown, and this camera does not always suit my needs. (Plus, people are often uncomfortable when they think that Im recording video, when Im only taking stills, since use of the LCD is necessary because theres not another viewfinder. This also leads to rapid use of batteries. Those LCD screens suck the life right out of batteries. I found it helpful to have rechargable batteries and a charger, as well.
I took this camera with my on a cruise and hoped to take lots of memorable shots (since its not often that I get to take vacations like that) but was disappointed when the camera would not take focused shots. I ended up having to get copies of photos from friends that went on the trip. Also, when you zoom in on anything, the LCD screen will show a blurry shot...sometimes the resulting picture will be blurry and sometimes it will be perfectly fine. I havent found a soulution to any of these problems yet, even reading the manuals and fooling with the butons. I tend to be very tech friendly, but this camera is often confusing.
Overall, its good for the price. If youre looking for a good camera for someone who takes plenty of silly videos and still shots from a reasonable distance, then this would probably suit your needs.
 On: 2006-07-09
camera works great, took it on my vacation and used it , videos cme out great !!!!!!
 On: 2006-03-21
As a video camera, the DC DXG-301v leaves a lot to be desired. Mine records sound terribly, and the video comes out "pixelly" if Im moving around. I find the stills, however, to be of great detail (I can see the wrinkles around my eyes...wait a minute...is this a good thing?). That being the one good feature isnt enough to make up for the other problem: the software. This camera comes with some cheesy brand of software that caused my computer to malfunction, then the problems ceased when I uninstalled the software. A friend who had the same software installed for a different camera said their computer was malfunctioning before I advised them to uninstall that particular software. Personally, I think you can do better for the money.
On: 2006-03-13
I purchased the DC DXG-301V Digital Video Recorder for my son who will be graduating this year from high school and he thought it would be fun to record his last few months with his friends. Its easy to use and very compact and if youre like me, if your child is happy then youre happy.
On: 2006-03-01
This camera is outstanding for the price. Features are mimimal but if you just want to take email quality and archival videos, youll be fine. Batteries run down quickly but check this out:
YOU CAN GO ON EBAY AND GET NOKIA CELL PHONE BATTERIES FOR 5.00 WHICH ARE THE SAME AS THE ADVERTISED BATTERIES WHICH COST 30-50$ I recharge it using my DELL PDA charger and it holds a charge for several hours of taping. Hope this helps.
On: 2006-01-19
Ive had two of these. The first I kept for about ~4 months, but felt the video quality was too poor. It was pixellated and dark indoors, so that with even bright lights youd only see dim objects. In addition, the flash was horribly mistimed, it either would show everything blue, or all black.
However, while many of the other flash camcorders out there may offer better quality video in the image department, the frame rate is usually variable. Shoot straight down a street and it looks fine, but turn and look at something dark or complex like trees and boom, 10FPs.
The 301V has a constant frame rate, and at 320X240, the best setting for it, the video zooms along pretty well. I also liked its mini-camcorder format, the little gizmos you hold like a raygun and press a button with your thumb have simply never felt right to me.
So after some back-and-forthing, I got another. 301V-2 is like a whole different camera. The flash is still feeble, but it times correctly and pictures come out pretty well. Nothing to compare to my digital SLR, but decent snapshot quality.
The video is still grainy, but now indoors its possible to see things under bright to normal lighting. Not a change worth shouting from the rooftops, but enough to make me carry this little thing around more. I dont know if I simply had a lemon last time, or DXG has put an improved firmware in the later cameras. Either way, I like it better.
Heres a quick rundown:
Battery life: Poor on alkalines, just buy a few sets of Nimh rechargeables.
Memory: 16MB internal thats not much good except for emergencies. Supposedly a 512MB SD card limit, but Ive used 1GB just fine.
Recording time: About 90 minutes or ~340 pictures per 512MB.
Format: ASF, a format that I think is basically MPEG4. Windows media player and movie player can work with it, but Macs have trouble.
Quality: Snapshot pictures and better-than-nothing videos. If youre wanting to make real movies or family memories, spend more money.
Cheapness: It isnt the most sturdy thing in the world, but I was able to take 301V-1 canoeing and it lived to talk about it.
Novelty: Its just neat, and different from the other gadgets.
On: 2006-01-11
I dont have the 301v, but I do have a similar DXG product. Please take a look at my review for the DXG-305v.
Anyone interested in the DXG-301v is invited to join the new DXG-Digital user group at Yahoo! to discuss all DXG products:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/dxg-digital
On: 2006-01-02
I bought this on sale at Radio Shack in November of 2004. No doubt they are cheaper now. Definitely get the larger cards, I have 2 of the 256 cards and they hold plenty. This camera went with us through the Canal, as well as a trip to California. Yes it does eat batteries, but this has been par for the course with most of my digital photography toys. I took 2 sets of rechargeables and was never at a loss for power.
Minus side - I have never been able to figure out the white balance, as a result movies in sunlight are very good, but indoors are greenish. The still feature is nice but I got better stills from my Fuji FinePix. It developed an intermittent, and turned out to be dirty contacts on one of the memory cards. Sound quality is not super hi-fi but more than adequate for home movies.
Plus side - Using the software, several clips can be stitched, edited, and made rather fancy. I only use the 640x480 mode, and a movie shot in sunlight, shown on a 27" TV, look quite acceptable. We have had a lot of fun with this camera, and I think it is a good choice as an entry-level tapeless movie camera. I just wish I could figure out the white balance, though!
Forget the digital zoom, it gets very pixelated. Get closer to your subject instead! People have always been amazed with this tiny movie camera, its fun to show off and use. It comes with a very practical case with shoulder strap. I do not regret having purchased it.
On: 2005-12-10
This 3 in 1 Digital Camera with Still Capability, is a beginners toy. If youre someone wholl be spending a lot of time with your camera taking lots of shots, then this DXG will let you down terribly. It comes with 4 AA batteries which the camera will eat in a flash, and youll find yourself hunting for more batteries all too frequently. I give it 1 star. When you check the resolution of shots on your pc or Tv, youll find the resolution good however.
On: 2005-10-24
I used this for my Random Samster videos and its pretty handy...If you want to edit videos in Windows Movie Maker you have to save it as another format like WMV or MOV for macs... when you film have good lighting or else your video will be too dark..its also good for taking pics of course
On: 2005-06-07
The most important thing to remember is this: What are you really expecting? You wont be getting a high quality do-all camcorder for $150. This is an interesting little gizmo that can store about 90 minutes of video on a 512MB card at 320X240. Its running about 25-30 frames a second, and the quality is somewhere between that of a camera phone and a low end tape camcorder.
If you thats all youre asking of the 301V, youll be happy with it.
The controls take a minute or two to get used to them, as essentially you have one menu for setup controlled by one button, and another button for the camera function menu. Take the time to preset the focus range and white balance, it makes a difference.
It fits in your hand fairly comfortably, and it is recognized on a PC or Mac as a mass storage device to copy files over. They do record in an .asf format, which works with no problem in Windows but takes a few hoops for a Mac. (See the reviews below.)
A few things kept me from rating it higher: (And remember I rated based on what I expected, a cheap and semi-expendable video gadget)
Theres no lens cap.
It has some knurled rings that look like focus/zoom controls and beg twisting or turning yet dont do anything. Somebody will break it trying to turn those.
It is built out of REALLY thin plastic.
Still, the LCD display isnt half bad and I can live with the video quality. I think the Musteks are more popular, but this one fits in your hand better (Comes with a grip strap and a carrying case) and it kind of grows on you after awhile.
On: 2005-05-14
A few people have said that this camera is awful when it isnt so before I begin this review i will say one thing: If you are looking for a high quality DV camera go and spend £600 on a brand new Sony camera. Do you honestly expect broadcast quality at this price?
When I decided to buy this camera I was actually looking for a simple point-and-click stills camera to take to music festivals with me. I chose this because the features are amazing for the price (£72 including postage from Ebay). (the cheapest brand-name camera i could find was closer to £150 and out of my budget range!)
In my experience the photos have been of a very high quality, the flash is bright, The LCD screen is also very clear (and it rotates 270 degrees and folds flat so you can watch the screen with it flat against the camera. This feature is normally only on really expensive cameras). 3.2 Megapixels is a very respectable maximum resolution and at full zoom (4x digital) there is only a very minimal loss in quality on still photos. As a point and click camera I have had excellent results both indoors and outdoors in varying conditions. The red-eye reduction and 10sec self-timer modes are also good features.
The video function is a great little bonus and the overall quality is very good, (and its very easy to record through your video player onto VHS or DVD if you want to.) The best mode to use is 320x240 resolution at 30 frames per second. Please dont expect this to be as good as the really expensive cameras... thats not what its designed for. I will say that is is as good as most fullscreen videos available on the internet. It is very watchable and it doesnt cry out as bad quality. I was actually very surprised at how good the quality was. (The video quality is much better than even the most expensive brand-named still cameras video clip output)
The camera is incredibly easy to connect to the PC. I have windows XP and it was simply a case of plugging it in. It opens as a USB Mass Storage device. I much prefer this to using clumsy software as with some other software. I am still yet to find a software program that actually makes it easier to organise your photos. i dont think they exist! :-)
There are a few extra purchases that id recommend to get that extra bit of enjoyment out of the camera:
1. Get some really good rechargeable batteries. I have heard that it eats alkalines for breakfast. I have never used alkalines with mine as i invested in some 2600mAh Ni-MH batteries and a charger. With these the camera lasts for a good 12 hours or so continuous filming, which I think is exceptional.
2. Buy a high-capacity SD card. I would especially recommend a 66x Ultra SD card. Itll cost you a tiny bit extra but makes the pictures load up much quicker. I picked up a 512MB one for around £30, and they are getting cheaper all the time. On my 512MB SD card i average around an hour and a half of video.
The problem with this camera is that it looks like a more expensive camera, so people expect far too much of it. Definitely buy this camera if you want an easy to use point-and-clicker. It is cheaper than every other stills camera without compromising on quality. If you treat the video function as an added bonus, you will be very pleasantly surprised.
I would definitely give this camera 10/10, as it gave me exactly what I expected from it and more.
On: 2005-02-06
I researched a lot of inexpensive tapeless cameras and bought this one from Axes for around $150. For that price, its an OK camera. Im a Mac user so right away there were problems with the movie files - the camera identifies as a mass storeage device so you can get the movies out of it, but theyre not quite really MP4 compliant files. There actually ASF (MS) - an MP4 variant that plays in Windows Media Player for Windows, but not for Mac. The bundled software is Win Only (which I knew) but is quirky in XP. For Mac, Mplayer (from Sourceforge) will play the movie files with decent rendering, and ffmpeg (also from Sourceforge) can convert them (needs 2 passes) to real MP4 files that will import to Quick Time or iMovie if you have a G4 or better Mac. The movie quality is only fair - visible blocking even on stills and pixelation when panning - but about what youd expect for a camera in this price range. 30 fps is only available in 320 X 200 mode. VGA size captures at 15 fps so fast motion is jerkey. The still photos are good for 3.2 MPixel, but saturation sets in early. Almost any 3 MP still campera will do better on stills, if thats what youre after. Invest in a set of four 2000 ma/hr rechargable batteries - it chugs alkalines like a thirsty welder swigs beer, speaking of which, for the price of a couple of bottles of Lager the folks who market this camera could have ported the Windows movie file extraction and conversion software over to Cocoa so it would run in OSX. For a cheap, very small unobtrusive tapeless video camera, this one has a nice feel and fair quality. If youre a Windows user and dont mind software that mysteriously quits or freezes once in a while, the bunlded aps are OK and theres always Media Player if you just want to watch and not edit. Mac users can get it to work if you know what youre doing with ffmpg and Mplayer (free open source apps) but it aint easy. If you have a NTSC to DV converter, you can play the files right off the camera using the video output, but you cant get rid of the data display, so youre stuck with the battery indicator and duration timer on screen. Also the audio rendering from the NTSC output is very distorted - a result of the cameras crummy audio CODEC. Too bad, since the audio quality of the video files is actually pretty good. I travel with this camera and use it casually in my consulting work -- I wanted something I wouldnt get too upset over if it got stolen. Nonetheless, Im saving up to buy a Fisher FVD-C1.
On: 2005-01-11
This is a great little camera and extremely easy to use. I took it out of the box and within an hour I was very comfortable with all the features. The video is good but you may need to edit the brightness from the viewer options to make it perfect. The stills, what can you say, its 3 mega-pixels...very good. the 4x digital zoom was very clear. The Audio is a bit distorted on the camera but when you play it back from your pc it is crystal clear. Overall I am very pleased with this camera especially for the money invested.
On: 2005-01-01
Given to me as a gift. I would rate this camera as unusable. Audio and picture quality is extremely poor.
|
|
