HP Photosmart M22 4MP Digital Camera
By: Hewlett-Packard Average Rating: 2.5 Total Reviews: 30
More Information
 On: 2007-12-27
Ive owned this camera for two years and havent had one problem with it. My batteries usually last 400-500 shots. Very few of my pictures have ever turned out bad, and those that did were operator error. The only problem I have ever had with it is the red-eye. I have added photos on this site that you can view....you can see for yourself. I just "dont get" the bad reviews that other people have put in.
 On: 2007-09-25
Ive had this camera about 2 years, it was a gift. I have updated the camera firmware, but it eats batteries and I get low battery warnings even from new batteries. The sliding lens cover is also the on/off switch but it frequently jams making it difficult to turn the camera on and off. The battery cover also opens too easily and many times while wrestling with the lens cover I accidentially open the battery compartment. It can take good pictures, but the picture quality is very inconsistent. Save yourself a lot of aggraviation and dont buy this camera. I was going to sell mine, but wouldnt feel good about sticking someone else with it, so I am just going to trash it.
 On: 2007-09-09
I borrowed this camera from my grandson and almost didnt want to give it back. This camera takes awesome sunset pictures! Even better than my own expensive camera. So far, its no. 1 on my sunset list.
On: 2007-07-06
I have never been good with cameras, but I bought the HP M22 in May 2006. I read the manual and tried all the features to learn how to use it. I took all the photos of my 40-yr. high school reunion, my sisters 70th birthday celebration, my trip to an organizational retreat, and made picture calendars for my family. This is a great little camera for the beginner to learn about digital photography. On a scale from 1 to 10, I would give it a 10!
On: 2007-04-01
Ive spent a small fortune on batteries for this camera and tried new and rechargeable batteries. Its gotten progressively worse and now (after 2 years) the camera turns on only occasionally and even then only when its plugged into the battery charger. Its a shame because its a nice camera when its operating.
Dont waste your money. Now I have to buy a new camera. You can bet it wont be an HP.
On: 2007-03-31
Ive spent a small fortune on batteries for this camera and tried new and rechargeable batteries. Its gotten progressively worse and now (after 2 years) the camera turns on only occasionally and even then only when its plugged into the battery charger. Its a shame because its a nice camera when its operating.
Dont waste your money. Now I have to buy a new camera. You can bet it wont be an HP.
On: 2007-02-25
We wanted a smallish idiotproof camera b/c one person in the family was a bit intimidated by our Canons many options. The HP was reasonably priced and seemed to fit the bill, but was a big mistake.
The first set of photos, indoor, came out really poor and yellow-ish. After that every time we tried to use it it was dead - it seemed to eat batteries (freshly charged rechargeables) just from sitting around for a week or two. Wed open the little door, but no red light. When we put freshly-charged OR new alkaline AA batteries in it and tried to use it immediately it worked only occasionally - it would take proably 3-4 battery swaps to actually work. These are the SAME rechargeable batteries we use in the Canon and in other devices, with NO problems.
All in all weve used it THREE times in almost a year - the initial set of yellow-ish shots, a few outdoor shots that worked ok, and a few indoor ones that were also ok.
Today we decided to check on warranty repair since its almost one year old, and guess what, it has only a 90 day warranty! Hmmm...its not too hard to figure out that HP didnt put much faith in this camera.
On the positive side, when it worked it did work easily, and it was easy to download the photos onto our Macs. Unfortunately, "when it worked" is the important phrase here - it seldom worked, and after seeing other reviews with similar battery problems, it doesnt seem that ours is unique. Too bad we didnt get smart and read the reviews before buying it!
Were going to get another Canon and the non-tecchie in the family can just set it at auto and leave it there.
On: 2007-02-24
We wanted a smallish idiotproof camera b/c one person in the family was a bit intimidated by our Canons many options. The HP was reasonably priced and seemed to fit the bill, but was a big mistake.
The first set of photos, indoor, came out really poor and yellow-ish. After that every time we tried to use it it was dead - it seemed to eat batteries (freshly charged rechargeables) just from sitting around for a week or two. Wed open the little door, but no red light. When we put freshly-charged OR new alkaline AA batteries in it and tried to use it immediately it worked only occasionally - it would take proably 3-4 battery swaps to actually work. These are the SAME rechargeable batteries we use in the Canon and in other devices, with NO problems.
All in all weve used it THREE times in almost a year - the initial set of yellow-ish shots, a few outdoor shots that worked ok, and a few indoor ones that were also ok.
Today we decided to check on warranty repair since its almost one year old, and guess what, it has only a 90 day warranty! Hmmm...its not too hard to figure out that HP didnt put much faith in this camera.
On the positive side, when it worked it did work easily, and it was easy to download the photos onto our Macs. Unfortunately, "when it worked" is the important phrase here - it seldom worked, and after seeing other reviews with similar battery problems, it doesnt seem that ours is unique. Too bad we didnt get smart and read the reviews before buying it!
Were going to get another Canon and the non-tecchie in the family can just set it at auto and leave it there.
On: 2007-01-07
I read all the negative user opinions on the web only AFTER I bought this model. There are definitely issues regarding draining batteries and inability to turn this unit ON. Here is my experience and I hope it would be helpful.
Alkaline batteries - Forget them. Youll likely only get 5-7 shots from them.
Rechargeable batteries - I already had numerous Ni-MH batteries (hi capacity 2000-2500 mAh) at home so I grabbed a pair of Rayovacs out of a recharger base (where I stored them) and popped them in the camera. When I turned on the camera the display said "batteries too low to take pictures". So I grabbed a different pair made by Sony from their charger and they worked without any problems. In fact, they lasted a whole day of picture taking and video shooting with plenty of juice to spare. I have done some research and experimentation (mixing and matching my batteries with different chargers) since that first day and truly believe the problems others have reported are related to the batteries used. To avoid problems, youll need high capacity Ni-MH rated over 2000mAh. But more importantly, you MUST have a good (smart) recharger that has built-in circuitry to properly monitor the condition of the battery and charge the batteries at the proper rate in order to top them off and then turn itself off at the correct time. Also, a good charger can trickle charge batteries stored in it for a long time. A cheap charger will either overcharge the batteries or allow them to drain (either way, the batteries will weaken over time). Avoid the quick 15 minute chargers as most of these only charge the batteries partially to 85% (as they say: there is no free lunch). And finally, keep this in mind: alkalines are rated 1.5V while Ni-MH are only 1.2V. If you have Ni-MH batteries that are partially charged or worn out, or not recharged optimally by a good charging base, you would be putting in a set of batteries measuring well under 1.2V and far below the 1.5V the camera is expecting. To think of it another way, if you put depleted alkalines into the camera, do you really expect the camera to work?
My other digital cameras share the same Rayovacs without problems. It seems the HP is just very sensative to the level of battery charge and is highly likely to report an error when the voltage is low, which is too bad for I think its a decent camera for the price. I also updated to the new firmware available on the HP website. This does not solve the powering up problem or the pickiness with the batteries, but seemed to have reduced the power consumption.
Hopefully my review will have helped others who are frustrated with their experience with this model.
On: 2006-11-24
I have had my camera for about a year now! You cant use regular old AA batteries, you have to spend the extra few dollars and get the energizer lithium batteries. Then you can get about 100 pictures from the batteries. I have dropped my camera a million times, and it still works perfectly. The camera I purchased before this one was a kodak easyshare, and it was horrible, it just shut off ALL THE TIME. So I am happy I picked a good camera the second time around! Also you can get cheap SD cards from amazon, try searching for them. They are usually like 80% off =) Not a bad deal.
On: 2006-11-23
I have had my camera for about a year now! You cant use regular old AA batteries, you have to spend the extra few dollars and get the energizer lithium batteries. Then you can get about 100 pictures from the batteries. I have dropped my camera a million times, and it still works perfectly. The camera I purchased before this one was a kodak easyshare, and it was horrible, it just shut off ALL THE TIME. So I am happy I picked a good camera the second time around! Also you can get cheap SD cards from amazon, try searching for them. They are usually like 80% off =) Not a bad deal.
On: 2006-09-16
i was scared this was my greatest mistake, since i bought the camera locally and came to amazon just to read the reviews aftewards.
if you use the right battery there is no problem. i have been taking lots of photos with flash for the whole week with and still going....
go ahead, buy it.
On: 2006-09-15
i was scared this was my greatest mistake, since i bought the camera locally and came to amazon just to read the reviews aftewards.
if you use the right battery there is no problem. i have been taking lots of photos with flash for the whole week with and still going....
go ahead, buy it.
On: 2006-09-04
This camera is one of the first models since Hewlett Packard changed its OEM factory. Intitially photo file sizes were so large that many users were unable to easily or quickly send pictures, but as more and more people are using High Speed Internet Connections, such as cable or dsl, the larger photo files have become less of a problem.
Photos generated by this camera can also be sent directly to a photo quality printer for immediate printing without the use of a computer.
On: 2006-09-03
This camera is one of the first models since Hewlett Packard changed its OEM factory. Intitially photo file sizes were so large that many users were unable to easily or quickly send pictures, but as more and more people are using High Speed Internet Connections, such as cable or dsl, the larger photo files have become less of a problem.
Photos generated by this camera can also be sent directly to a photo quality printer for immediate printing without the use of a computer.
On: 2006-08-23
I have used this camera since May 2005 with excellent results in taking over 4,400 photographs. It has performed very well in rain & good weather. Everything about it seems to be of good quality. The reviewer that complained about the flickering display needs to have the batteries fully charged first or else use the Lithium batteries that are sold practically everywhere. I have had a couple of times that the camera did not turn on and it was due to batteries that were not fully charged... The problem was with a different brand of battery charger that said the batteries were charged when they really were not fully charged. A different charger solved the problem. It is a surprize to learn that some people have had problems with such a fine camera as the HP M22 Digital Camera. There are very few other digital cameras that are weather resistant and this is one of the few that is rain proof without the purchase of a special case.
On: 2006-08-22
I have used this camera since May 2005 with excellent results in taking over 4,400 photographs. It has performed very well in rain & good weather. Everything about it seems to be of good quality. The reviewer that complained about the flickering display needs to have the batteries fully charged first or else use the Lithium batteries that are sold practically everywhere. I have had a couple of times that the camera did not turn on and it was due to batteries that were not fully charged... The problem was with a different brand of battery charger that said the batteries were charged when they really were not fully charged. A different charger solved the problem. It is a surprize to learn that some people have had problems with such a fine camera as the HP M22 Digital Camera. There are very few other digital cameras that are weather resistant and this is one of the few that is rain proof without the purchase of a special case.
On: 2006-07-04
Ive owned the M22 for nearly a year & have used it on maybe 10 occasions. The last time I was going to use it the batteries went dead. Its taken me some time to get new batteries (about 2 months), but when I did the camera wouldnt turn on. I called the HP troubleshooting people - they told me the camera was no longer under warranty, (sadly I had not read the fine print that the warranty was for 90 days in the U.S. "and a one year limited warranty in other English-speaking countries" - a bit odd) but that I should be using lithium batteries (I was using Duracell Power Pix). I bought the lithium batteries and still not working. The HP troubleshooter said I could pay $30 to have the issue troubleshot, but it seems from the reviews Ive read here that HP has made a horrible product and no amount of troubleshooting is going to make it work. I also read in the fine print that they use refurbished parts in their cameras -- my feeling is that if they are using refurbished parts then the warranty should be for a longer period of time and it should be clearly stated on the outside of the package that refurbished parts have been used. Granted, I bought this camera in a bundle with a photo printer (oddly the printer has a warranty period of 1 year) for a very low price from Target, but a quality product should have been sold. This experience lessens (if not erases) my trust in what I thought was a reliable company. HP really needs to remember the importance of quality products and customer satisfaction.
On: 2006-07-03
Ive owned the M22 for nearly a year & have used it on maybe 10 occasions. The last time I was going to use it the batteries went dead. Its taken me some time to get new batteries (about 2 months), but when I did the camera wouldnt turn on. I called the HP troubleshooting people - they told me the camera was no longer under warranty, (sadly I had not read the fine print that the warranty was for 90 days in the U.S. "and a one year limited warranty in other English-speaking countries" - a bit odd) but that I should be using lithium batteries (I was using Duracell Power Pix). I bought the lithium batteries and still not working. The HP troubleshooter said I could pay $30 to have the issue troubleshot, but it seems from the reviews Ive read here that HP has made a horrible product and no amount of troubleshooting is going to make it work. I also read in the fine print that they use refurbished parts in their cameras -- my feeling is that if they are using refurbished parts then the warranty should be for a longer period of time and it should be clearly stated on the outside of the package that refurbished parts have been used. Granted, I bought this camera in a bundle with a photo printer (oddly the printer has a warranty period of 1 year) for a very low price from Target, but a quality product should have been sold. This experience lessens (if not erases) my trust in what I thought was a reliable company. HP really needs to remember the importance of quality products and customer satisfaction.
On: 2006-06-21
The story goes like this:
Considering the specifications I decided M22 is the camera for my daughter (she is 10): metal case, waterproof, small, no external moving parts, standard batteries, easy to use, reasonable image quality.
I have deliberately ignored the internet warnings over reliability considering that every product has its share of bad copies. Big mistake! Twice as big since I live in Bucharest and here the price is twice the price in NY (I have paid about 170$).
The first camera the seller took it from the sealed box refused to start. He changed the batteries, and then he replaced them with rechargeable batteries... no result. It was like he took it from its coffin.
The second one started nicely. I have played with it a bit but I have failed to notice the aluminum case had a defect, not a big problem, but annoying.
I knew this kind of camera does not correctly report the status of battery, so I replaced the firmware with the last released version and then I took about 20 pictures. Then... the camera ceases to work: each time I pushed the shooting button the LCD started to flicker like a psychedelic light and then the camera restarts. Finally, like the one in the first coffin, it refused to start. I have changed the batteries... nothing... dead!
The service refused to officially tell me how many HP cameras refused to work but he, unofficially, told me I bought the worst camera. HP proved it has no respect for the customer.
Pros: when you start the camera (if it starts!) with the flash button pressed a set of test application start. One of these applications is searching for dead pixels and, if it finds any, it re-computes the interpolation matrix so as to hide the dead pixels. The service guys from Canon asked me about 30$ to perform this operation.
There is one good thing about this story: I have learned to listen to internet opinion.
On: 2006-05-13
My cell phone takes better looking pics then this thing does. I was trying to capture the way my girlfriend looked one night because she looked great. The lighting in the room was just right. First, I had to change the batteries. Then, every picture I took made her look horrible. I tried every setting I could find. I turned the flash on and off and adjusted every single thing on the camera. Most of the pictures were extremely blurry. I actually ended up using the camera on my cell phone.
On: 2006-03-25
Besides its sleek look and compact size this camera has nothing good to offer. The digital quality of the pictures are POOR, it wastes batteries way too fast and you cant zoom in.
On: 2006-03-24
Besides its sleek look and compact size this camera has nothing good to offer. The digital quality of the pictures are POOR, it wastes batteries way too fast and you cant zoom in.
On: 2006-03-21
I bought this camera for my daughters birthday.
After capturing several pictures the camera kept on showing batteries are depleted, I changed the batteries, bought rechargeable batteries (per their recommendation), nothing helped.
They sent me a new camera which stopped working altogether after several uses, upon which they sent me another one, which flickered and turned off when turning on.
Finally I called them and said I need my money back, I was offered a m407. Its supposed to arrive tomorrow, Im not too confident about it.
On: 2006-03-20
I bought this camera for my daughters birthday.
After capturing several pictures the camera kept on showing batteries are depleted, I changed the batteries, bought rechargeable batteries (per their recommendation), nothing helped.
They sent me a new camera which stopped working altogether after several uses, upon which they sent me another one, which flickered and turned off when turning on.
Finally I called them and said I need my money back, I was offered a m407. Its supposed to arrive tomorrow, Im not too confident about it.
On: 2006-02-26
I purchased the HP Photosmart m22 for $119 at the local variety store. Its my first digital camera. I wanted a camera that made pictures that were adequate for web postings and easy to load onto my computer. My other requirements were AA batteries and SD card memory. Those criteria and price guided my purchase.
My first test shots have been posted, my sailboat and the neighbors house. They were made at the lowest quality image setting - VGA, and the highest iso setting of 400. VGA shots use about 120k of memory. The camera holds 70 shots at VGA setting with internal memory alone, 1936 shots at VGA setting after insertion of a 256meg internal card. At the highest quality setting, images take up over a meg of memory. At the high quality setting the internal memory will hold about 5 images.
After taking some test shots, I plugged the provided USB cord into the camera and into my computer. Im running W98. I manually loaded the drivers onto my computer from the software CD. The camera was recognized as an external storage device and the jpg images in the camera were a snap to copy to my hard drive.
I used alkaline batteries and took about 30 shots. I never got any of the low battery alerts mentioned in other reviews. Then I turned the flash on. About 6 pictures later my batteries were exhausted. I put in some fully charged NiMH batteries and they have given me better service. That multiple flash red eye setting crushes batteries. If you want battery longevity, use the flash sparingly.
Digital zooms are a misnomer. All they do is digitally magnify a central portion of the image. If you want zoom, get optical. Since my favorite film camera is a 38mm rangefinder, Im used to the limitations of a fixed lens. I plan on carrying the camera in my pocket and the lack of optical zoom and the necessary protruding lens is a plus for me.
On: 2006-02-07
Picture quality is very mediocre. As other posters have noted, a little more money gets much more bang for the buck. A friend recently bought a Canon Powershot A520 and it seems like much more camera for the money.
A firmware upgrade is causing a premature "Batteries are depleted" message. See - http://groups.google.com/groups?hl=en&q=HP+M22+batteries+depleted
Pros - Compact size. Weather resistant.
Cons - No optical viewfinder. I guess thats a size tradeoff. Poor picture quality. I usually shoot with a D70, but even for the money the M22 doesnt seeem like a good value.
 On: 2006-01-27
I guess its true that you get what you pay for. The thing that really disappoints me about this camera is that the zoom function is not actually a zoom at all. It is actaually a "cropping" function. "Zooming" with this camera actually reduces the size of your photo rather than giving you a full-size closeup. Very disappointed.
On: 2006-01-26
I guess its true that you get what you pay for. The thing that really disappoints me about this camera is that the zoom function is not actually a zoom at all. It is actaually a "cropping" function. "Zooming" with this camera actually reduces the size of your photo rather than giving you a full-size closeup. Very disappointed.
On: 2006-01-15
This camera takes great photos and is easy to use. My 11 year old daughter loves it. BUT..... it goes through batteries like candy. We have been using regular alkaline batteries and our recharger does not load them with enough power to be re-usable. We are hoping to soon acquire a battery & charger set designed for the camera.
On: 2006-01-04
We also have experienced the disappointing "battery too low to take pictures" warning. Nothing wrong with the batteries, by the way. We checked them with our battery tester. Looking for help and will share with others if we find the solution.
On: 2006-01-04
With 4MP, the camera took good quality pictures. Also, a small size camera with its metal case allows me to carry it all the time to take pictures with my son. However, the battery is the major problem, I put in 2 brand new alkaline batteries, it still give me low battery message and wont allow me to take picture. Put in fully charged Nimh batteries, it will do the same thing until I reset the camera. However, same message display randomly when you turn on the camera. It is confusing. I will try to upgrade the firmware which was released Dec 2005 from HP website. If it does not fix the issue, I may retrun it.
On: 2006-01-03
With 4MP, the camera took good quality pictures. Also, a small size camera with its metal case allows me to carry it all the time to take pictures with my son. However, the battery is the major problem, I put in 2 brand new alkaline batteries, it still give me low battery message and wont allow me to take picture. Put in fully charged Nimh batteries, it will do the same thing until I reset the camera. However, same message display randomly when you turn on the camera. It is confusing. I will try to upgrade the firmware which was released Dec 2005 from HP website. If it does not fix the issue, I may retrun it.
On: 2005-12-27
Ive always envied the others around me with digital cameras, but I finally recieved one for Christmas 2005, and it happened to be this one. It has a lot of different features, all of which impress me.
Ive also read from other customers that the battery life is horrible, while not horrible, it has poor battery life.
But Ive devised a plan to just keep the camera off when Im not taking pictures. It only takes a few seconds for the camera to power up, so unless you want to take a picture of something that will be gone in 2 seconds, keep it on. But if youre just walking around and see something interesting, turn it on.
Just keep it off when you arent taking pictures.
I also advise you buy rechargable batteries
On: 2005-12-26
Ive always envied the others around me with digital cameras, but I finally recieved one for Christmas 2005, and it happened to be this one. It has a lot of different features, all of which impress me.
Ive also read from other customers that the battery life is horrible, while not horrible, it has poor battery life.
But Ive devised a plan to just keep the camera off when Im not taking pictures. It only takes a few seconds for the camera to power up, so unless you want to take a picture of something that will be gone in 2 seconds, keep it on. But if youre just walking around and see something interesting, turn it on.
Just keep it off when you arent taking pictures.
I also advise you buy rechargable batteries
On: 2005-12-20
This would be a really great little camera if it wasnt for the fact that I had to change the batteries several times a day. I tried using alkaline, NiMH rechargable, and lithium, and the results were exactly the same. When I sent it back and received another one, the exact same thing happened. For this reason, this camera was completely useless. There are other issues with the camera, but theyre not even worth mentioning since the camera wont stay on long enough to notice. If I hadnt brought my old camera as backup, I would have been really upset during a recent 3-week trip to Europe.
On: 2005-12-14
This camera works whenever it wants. After contacting customer support he suggested me to do a power reset. I lost confidence on this piece and shopping for a new one. Probably I will pay more and go to SD450 or SD500
Also make sure you carry couple of batteries for a day trip( for 75 pictures) :)
On: 2005-12-13
This camera works whenever it wants. After contacting customer support he suggested me to do a power reset. I lost confidence on this piece and shopping for a new one. Probably I will pay more and go to SD450 or SD500
Also make sure you carry couple of batteries for a day trip( for 75 pictures) :)
 On: 2005-12-03
I had the same problem as the other reviewer. my batteries died quickly heck i even bought the energizer lithium batteries that they recommend so much. my camera like hers worked when ever it wanted too. i dont know maybe the other reviewers got lucky and their camera works. when the camera did work i did manage to get some nice pictures of my cats. ill probably buy a different brand next time.
On: 2005-11-27
I got this camera as an early birthday present. Less than one week later I had to return it. First the camera turns on by sliding a door that covers the lens over. This mechanism works only when it wants to. Half the time you cant even get the camera to turn on.
When its on it immediately drains the batteries. I changed the batteries twice in three days.
Somewhere around the 6 day mark the camera just stopped working completely.
In addition the software takes forever to download and ended up corrupting many of my files during the installation process. The pics are ok at best. They are pretty sharp if youre just going to email pics but if youre going to actually be printing them out, the quality is subpar.
Overall a horribly disappointing experience and a waste of money. I have since exchanged the camera for another brand altogether and I am much happier.
On: 2005-09-06
i purchased this camera for myself, as i love digital photography. photoshop can do wonders. anyway, i take this camera everywhere i go and take pictures of random things, and play around with them on photoshop. this camera produces pictures at the perfect size i need. the LCD screen is just the right size and the buttons are not too small. the memory on it is horrible. it hardly holds any pictures. i recommend a memory card with about 52mb for a reasonable price. this camera is a great buy for not a lot of money.
On: 2005-09-05
i purchased this camera for myself, as i love digital photography. photoshop can do wonders. anyway, i take this camera everywhere i go and take pictures of random things, and play around with them on photoshop. this camera produces pictures at the perfect size i need. the LCD screen is just the right size and the buttons are not too small. the memory on it is horrible. it hardly holds any pictures. i recommend a memory card with about 52mb for a reasonable price. this camera is a great buy for not a lot of money.
On: 2005-07-02
The camera is a piece of junk. I wish I could change my number of stars to 0. I previously wrote a good review of this camera because it started out working great. Now, you cant take a CLEAR picture of anything unless it is resting on a flat, non-moving surface. Otherwise, good luck trying to make out whatever is in the picture. Everyone who has used my camera has told me that it is terrible.
I bought this camera as an "upgrade" from my previous HP 3.0 megapixel camera. I want my old camera back! I dont know if this is just a poorly made model because I havent had problems with any other HP cameras. Do yourselves a favor, save yourselves some money, dont buy this M22.
On: 2005-06-05
I use it for backpacking and camping trips in the Pacific Northwest. Im not a photo nut, just in it for the memories. I needed something light for backpacking and cheap incase the thing gets destroyed along the way. It has all the features I need and then some. Its light, compact and the weather resistance is a great plus. I took it out to Glacier National Park with a 256MB and it worked out great. Worked well in most lighting conditions. Got some great sunset shots. All in all, very happy with it for the $149 I paid.
On: 2005-06-04
I use it for backpacking and camping trips in the Pacific Northwest. Im not a photo nut, just in it for the memories. I needed something light for backpacking and cheap incase the thing gets destroyed along the way. It has all the features I need and then some. Its light, compact and the weather resistance is a great plus. I took it out to Glacier National Park with a 256MB and it worked out great. Worked well in most lighting conditions. Got some great sunset shots. All in all, very happy with it for the $149 I paid.
On: 2005-05-31
I read a review by a professional that described this camera as a great replacemant for all those disposable cameras that you buy, and never seem to get good pictures from. I have to agree totally with this.
The camera works good when you are outdoors in very bright lighting, however you have to give it alot of time to focus, and if you use it indoors forget about getting pictures that are worth anything. I had problems taking pictures in a gym that had very bright lighting, all i got was a bunch if fuzy, indistiguishable pictures, a picture of my friend looked like a blob of color on the color of what was supposed to be a hardwood basketball floor.
I guess that is the kind of performance i should expect from a $150 camera. I purchased a Canon A520 and am much more happy.
On a good note one of the features that i liked was the Adaptive Lighting Technology feature. if you are taking a picture and your main subject is lit and the background is dark, then this technlogy will make the background brighter and more vivid color. This technology is great, if you are able to get a decent picture.
|
|
